<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org">
<title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions current issue</title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org</link>
<description>Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1936-8798</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>January 2012</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1936-8798</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/e1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/12?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/21?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/23?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/36?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/44?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/47?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/64?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/72?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/80?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/82?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/90?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/98?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/112?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/114?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/116?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/116-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/119?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions</title>
<url>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Retrograde Technique for Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions: A Step-by-Step Approach]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>Chronic total occlusion recanalization still represents the final frontier in percutaneous coronary intervention. Retrograde chronic total occlusion recanalization has recently become an essential complement to the classical antegrade approach. In experienced hands, the retrograde technique currently has a high success rate with a low complication profile, despite frequent utilization in the most anatomically and clinically complex patients. Since its initial description, important changes have occurred that make the technique faster and more successful. We propose a step-by-step approach of the technique as practiced at experienced centers in North America. Because the technique can vary substantially, we describe the different alternatives to each step and offer what we perceived to be the most efficient techniques.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joyal, D., Thompson, C. A., Grantham, J. A., Buller, C. E. H., Rinfret, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.011</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Retrograde Technique for Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions: A Step-by-Step Approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>State-of-the-Art Paper</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/e1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Overcoming Limited Depth Penetration of Optical Coherence Tomography With Wire Bias]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/e1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yan, W., Ward, M. R., Nelson, G., Figtree, G. A., Bhindi, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.021</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/e1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Overcoming Limited Depth Penetration of Optical Coherence Tomography With Wire Bias]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Images in Intervention</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/12?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Examination of the In Vivo Mechanisms of Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis: Findings From Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/12?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study investigated the role of uncovered stent struts on late stent thrombosis (LST) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation with optical coherence tomography (OCT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Autopsy studies have identified delayed healing and lack of endothelialization of DES struts as the hallmarks of LST. DES strut coverage has not previously been examined in vivo in patients with LST.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We studied 54 patients, including 18 with DES LST (median 615 days after implant) undergoing emergent percutaneous coronary interventions and 36 matched DES control subjects undergoing routine repeat OCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) who did not experience LST for &ge;3 years. Thrombus aspiration was performed during emergent percutaneous coronary intervention before OCT and IVUS assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>By OCT, patients with LST&mdash;compared with control subjects&mdash;had a higher percentage of uncovered (median [interquartile range]) (12.27 [5.50 to 23.33] vs. 4.14 [3.00 to 6.22], p &lt; 0.001) and malapposed (4.60 [1.85 to 7.19] vs. 1.81 [0.00 to 2.99], p &lt; 0.001) struts. The mean neointimal thickness was similar in the 2 groups (0.23 &plusmn; 0.17 mm vs. 0.17 &plusmn; 0.09 mm, p = 0.28). By IVUS, stent expansion was comparable in the 2 groups, although positive remodeling was increased in patients with LST (mean vessel cross-section area 19.4 &plusmn; 5.8 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. 15.1 &plusmn; 4.6 mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.003). Thrombus aspiration demonstrated neutrophils and eosinophils in most cases. By multivariable analysis, the length of segment with uncovered stent struts by OCT and the remodeling index by IVUS were independent predictors of LST.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this in vivo case-controlled study, the presence of uncovered stent struts as assessed by OCT and positive vessel remodeling as imaged by IVUS were associated with LST after DES.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guagliumi, G., Sirbu, V., Musumeci, G., Gerber, R., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Ikejima, H., Ladich, E., Lortkipanidze, N., Matiashvili, A., Valsecchi, O., Virmani, R., Stone, G. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.018</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/12</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Examination of the In Vivo Mechanisms of Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis: Findings From Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>20</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/21?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do We Know What Causes Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis?]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/21?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mintz, G. S., Maehara, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.010</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/21</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do We Know What Causes Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial Comment</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>22</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/23?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transradial Versus Transfemoral Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score-Adjusted and -Matched Analysis From the REAL (REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia-Romagna) Multicenter Registry]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/23?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study sought to assess whether transradial intervention, by minimizing access-site bleeding and vascular events, improves outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with the transfemoral approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Bleeding and consequent blood product transfusions have been causally associated with a higher mortality rate in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We identified all adults undergoing percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction in Emilia-Romagna, a region in the north of Italy of 4 million residents, between January 1, 2003, and July 30, 2009, at 12 referral hospitals using a region-mandated database of percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Differences in the risk of death at 2 years between patients undergoing transfemoral versus transradial intervention, assessed on an intention-to-treat basis, were determined from vital statistics records and compared based on propensity score adjustment and matching.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 11,068 patients were treated for acute myocardial infarction (8,000 via transfemoral and 3,068 via transradial route). According to analysis of matched pairs, the 2-year, risk-adjusted mortality rates were lower for the transradial than for the transfemoral group (8.8% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.0250). The rate of vascular complications requiring surgery or need for blood transfusion were also significantly decreased in the transradial group (1.1% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.0052).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction, transradial treatment is associated with decreased 2-year mortality rates and a reduction in the need for vascular surgery and/or blood transfusion compared with transfemoral intervention.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valgimigli, M., Saia, F., Guastaroba, P., Menozzi, A., Magnavacchi, P., Santarelli, A., Passerini, F., Sangiorgio, P., Manari, A., Tarantino, F., Margheri, M., Benassi, A., Sangiorgi, M. G., Tondi, S., Marzocchi, A., REAL Registry Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.018</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/23</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transradial Versus Transfemoral Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score-Adjusted and -Matched Analysis From the REAL (REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia-Romagna) Multicenter Registry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>35</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/36?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Leipzig Prospective Vascular Ultrasound Registry in Radial Artery Catheterization: Impact of Sheath Size on Vascular Complications]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/36?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study investigated the impact of sheath size on the rate of radial artery occlusions (RAO) (primary objective) and other access site complications (hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula) as secondary objectives after transradial coronary catheterization.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The number of vascular access complications in the published data ranges from 5% to 38% after transradial catheterization.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Between November 2009 and August 2010, 455 patients 65.3 &plusmn; 10.9 years of age (62.2% male) with transradial access with 5-F (n = 153) or 6-F (n = 302) arterial sheaths were prospectively recruited. Duplex sonography was obtained in each patient before discharge. Patients with symptomatic RAO were treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and a follow-up was performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The incidence of access site complications was 14.4% with 5-F sheaths compared with 33.1% with 6-F sheaths (p &lt; 0.001). Radial artery occlusion occurred in 13.7% with 5-F sheaths compared with 30.5% with 6-F sheaths (p &lt; 0.001). There was no difference between groups with regard to hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysms, or arteriovenous fistulas. Female sex, larger sheath size, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, and younger age independently predicted RAO in multivariate analysis. In total, 42.5% of patients with RAO were immediately symptomatic; another 7% became symptomatic within a mean of 4 days. Of patients with RAO, 59% were treated with LMWH. The recanalization rates were significantly higher in patients receiving LMWH compared with conventional therapy (55.6% vs. 13.5%, p &lt; 0.001) after a mean of 14 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The incidence of RAO by vascular ultrasound was higher than expected from previous data, especially in patients who underwent the procedure with larger sheaths.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uhlemann, M., Mobius-Winkler, S., Mende, M., Eitel, I., Fuernau, G., Sandri, M., Adams, V., Thiele, H., Linke, A., Schuler, G., Gielen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.011</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/36</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Leipzig Prospective Vascular Ultrasound Registry in Radial Artery Catheterization: Impact of Sheath Size on Vascular Complications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>43</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/44?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Observations From a Transradial Registry: Our Remedies Oft in Ourselves Do Lie]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/44?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rao, S. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.005</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/44</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Observations From a Transradial Registry: Our Remedies Oft in Ourselves Do Lie]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial Comment</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>46</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/47?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Kissing Balloon or Sequential Dilation of the Side Branch and Main Vessel for Provisional Stenting of Bifurcations: Lessons From Micro-Computed Tomography and Computational Simulations]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/47?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study sought to evaluate post-dilation strategies in bifurcation stenting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In bifurcation stenting practice, it is still controversial how post-dilation should be performed and whether the kissing balloon (KB) technique is mandatory when only the main vessel (MV) receives a stent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A series of drug-eluting stents (DES) (n = 26) were deployed in a coronary bifurcation model following a provisional approach. After the deployment of the stent in the MV, post-dilation with the KB technique was compared with a 2-step, sequential post-dilation of the side branch (SB) and MV without kissing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The percentage of the SB lumen area free of stent struts was similar after KB (79.1 &plusmn; 8.7%) and after the 2-step sequence (74.4 &plusmn; 11.6%, p = 0.25), a considerable improvement compared with MV stenting only without dilation of the stent at the SB ostium (30.8 &plusmn; 7.8%, p &lt; 0.0001). The rate of strut malapposition in the ostium was 21.3 &plusmn; 9.2% after KB and 24.9 &plusmn; 10.4% after the 2-step sequence, respectively, a significant reduction compared with a simple SB dilation (55.3 &plusmn; 16.8%, p &lt; 0.0001) or MV stenting only (47.0 &plusmn; 8.5%, p &lt; 0.0005). KB created a significant elliptical overexpansion of the MV lumen, inducing higher stress concentration proximal to the SB. KB also led to a higher risk of incomplete stent apposition at the proximal stent edge (30.7 &plusmn; 26.4% vs. 2.8 &plusmn; 9.6% for 2-step, p = 0.0016).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Sequential 2-step post-dilation of the SB and MV may offer a simpler and more efficient alternative to final KB technique for provisional stenting of bifurcations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foin, N., Torii, R., Mortier, P., De Beule, M., Viceconte, N., Chan, P. H., Davies, J. E., Xu, X. Y., Krams, R., Di Mario, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.019</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/47</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Kissing Balloon or Sequential Dilation of the Side Branch and Main Vessel for Provisional Stenting of Bifurcations: Lessons From Micro-Computed Tomography and Computational Simulations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Angiographic Stent Thrombosis at Coronary Bifurcations: Short- and Long-Term Prognosis]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study sought to describe the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients presenting with angiographic definite stent thrombosis (ST) at coronary bifurcations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The development of drug-eluting stents has made it increasingly feasible to treat bifurcation lesions percutaneously. However, ST at coronary bifurcations may be associated with greater mortality than ST elsewhere.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We analyzed a multicenter California registry comprising all cases of angiographic definite ST at 5 academic hospitals from 2005 to 2010. Stenting was defined as occurring at a bifurcation if the main vessel stent crossed a side branch &ge;2.0 mm in diameter (provisional single-stent approach), or if there was a prior 2-stent bifurcation approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 173 cases of angiographic definite ST, we identified 20 cases of ST at coronary bifurcations. Nine of 20 bifurcation ST (45%) occurred with a stent present in both the parent and branch vessel. Eight cases had thrombus present in both the parent and side branch vessels. In-hospital mortality was much higher for subjects with bifurcation ST than ST at a nonbifurcation site (20% vs. 2%, p &lt; 0.0001). During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, ST at a coronary bifurcation was associated with increased long-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4 to 7.7, p = 0.007) and a significantly higher risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.04 to 4.8, p = 0.04) relative to ST at a nonbifurcation site.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ST at coronary bifurcations is associated with a higher in-hospital and long-term mortality than ST at nonbifurcation lesions. (Stent Thrombus in Acute Coronary Syndromes; <A HREF="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00931502?term=NCT00931502&amp;rank=1">NCT00931502</A>)</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armstrong, E. J., Yeo, K. K., Javed, U., Mahmud, E., Patel, M., Shunk, K. A., MacGregor, J. S., Low, R. I., Rogers, J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.015</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/57</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Angiographic Stent Thrombosis at Coronary Bifurcations: Short- and Long-Term Prognosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>63</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/64?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Sirolimus-Eluting Cypher Select Coronary Stent for the Treatment of Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Insights From the e-SELECT (Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance) Registry]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/64?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study sought to compare the 1-year safety and efficacy of Cypher Select or Cypher Select Plus (Cordis Corporation, Bridgewater, New Jersey) sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) with the treatment of bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) in nonselected, real-world patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>There is paucity of consistent data on DES for the treatment of ISR, especially, DES ISR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The e-SELECT (Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance) registry is a Web-based, multicenter and international registry encompassing virtually all subsets of patients and lesions treated with at least 1 SES during the period from 2006 to 2008. We enrolled in this pre-specified subanalysis all patients with at least 1 clinically relevant BMS or DES ISR treated with SES. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis rate at 1 year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 15,147 patients enrolled, 1,590 (10.5%) presented at least 1 ISR (BMS group, n = 1,235, DES group, n = 355). Patients with DES ISR had higher incidence of diabetes (39.4% vs. 26.9%, p &lt; 0.001), renal insufficiency (5.8% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.003), and prior coronary artery bypass graft (20.5% vs. 11.8%, p &lt; 0.001). At 1 year, death (1.4% for BMS vs. 2.1% for DES, p = 0.3) and myocardial infarction (2.4% for BMS and 3.3% for DES, p = 0.3) rates were similar, whereas ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization and definite/probable late stent thrombosis were higher in patients with DES ISR (6.9% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.003, and 1.8% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.04, respectively).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Use of SES for either BMS or DES ISR treatment is safe and associated with low target lesion revascularization recurrence and no apparent safety concern.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abizaid, A., Costa, J. R., Banning, A., Bartorelli, A. L., Dzavik, V., Ellis, S., Gao, R., Holmes, D. R., Jeong, M. H., Legrand, V., Neumann, F.-J., Nyakern, M., Orlick, A., Spaulding, C., Worthley, S., Urban, P. M., e-SELECT Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.016</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/64</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Sirolimus-Eluting Cypher Select Coronary Stent for the Treatment of Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Insights From the e-SELECT (Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance) Registry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>64</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/72?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessing the Learning Curve]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/72?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve for the implantation of the percutaneous aortic valve via the transfemoral route.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Transcutaneous aortic valve insertion is a fundamentally new procedure for the treatment of aortic valve stenosis. The number of cases needed to gain proficiency with concomitant ease and familiarity (i.e., the "learning curve") with the procedure is unknown.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We performed a retrospective analysis of the first 44 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation as part of the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial at our institution between November 2008 and May 2011.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The median age of the patients was 83 years (interquartile range: 77 to 87 years) and a median Society of Thoracic Surgery risk score of 9.6. Pre-procedural assessment of the aortic valve revealed a mean gradient of 53.5 mm Hg, mean aortic valve area of 0.7 mm<sup>2</sup>, and a median ejection fraction of 59.5%. Patients were divided into tertiles based on sequence. Significant decreases in median contrast volume (180 to 160 to 130 ml, p = 0.003), valvuloplasty to valve deployment time (12.0 to 11.6 to 7.0 min, p &lt; 0.001) and fluoroscopy times, from 26.1 to 17.2 and 14.3 min occurred from tertiles 1 to 3, p &lt; 0.001. Significant decreases in radiation doses were also seen across the 3 tertiles, p &lt; 0.001. The 30-day mortality for the entire cohort was 11%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Experience accumulated over 44 transfemoral aortic valve implantations led to significant decreases in procedural times, radiation, and contrast volumes. Our data show increasing proficiency with evidence of plateau after the first 30 cases. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alli, O. O., Booker, J. D., Lennon, R. J., Greason, K. L., Rihal, C. S., Holmes, D. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.014</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:jaccinterv;j.jcin.2011.09.014</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessing the Learning Curve]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Expedited Publications: Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/80?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lessons From the Learning Curve]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/80?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Block, P. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.008</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:jaccinterv;j.jcin.2011.10.008</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lessons From the Learning Curve]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial Comment</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>80</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/82?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantifying the Learning Curve in the Use of a Novel Vascular Closure Device: An Analysis of the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) CathPCI Registry]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/82?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study sought to quantify the learning curve for the safety and effectiveness of a newly introduced vascular closure device through evaluation of the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) CathPCI clinical outcomes registry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The impact of learning on the clinical outcomes complicates the assessment of the safety and efficacy during the early experience with newly introduced medical devices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We performed a retrospective analysis of the relationship between cumulative institutional experience and clinical device success, defined as device deployment success and freedom from any vascular complications, for the StarClose vascular closure device (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, California). Generalized estimating equation modeling was used to develop risk-adjusted clinical success predictions that were analyzed to quantify learning curve rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 107,710 procedures used at least 1 StarClose deployment, between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007, with overall clinical success increasing from 93% to 97% during the study period. The learning curve was triphasic, with an initial rapid learning phase, followed by a period of declining rates of success, followed finally by a recovery to a steady-state rate of improved device success. The rates of learning were influenced positively by diagnostic (vs. percutaneous coronary intervention) procedure use and teaching status and were affected inversely by annual institutional volume.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>An institutional-level learning curve for the initial national experience of StarClose was triphasic, likely indicating changes in patient selection and expansion of number of operators during the initial phases of device adoption. The rate of learning was influenced by several institutional factors, including overall procedural volume, utilization for percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, and teaching status.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Resnic, F. S., Wang, T. Y., Arora, N., Vidi, V., Dai, D., Ou, F.-S., Matheny, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.017</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/82</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantifying the Learning Curve in the Use of a Novel Vascular Closure Device: An Analysis of the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) CathPCI Registry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/90?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevention of Contrast Nephropathy by Furosemide With Matched Hydration: The MYTHOS (Induced Diuresis With Matched Hydration Compared to Standard Hydration for Contrast Induced Nephropathy Prevention) Trial]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/90?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study investigated the effect of furosemide-forced diuresis and intravenous saline infusion matched with urine output, using a novel dedicated device designed for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) prevention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>CIN is a frequent cause of acute kidney injury associated with increased morbidity and mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 170 consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing coronary procedures were randomized to either furosemide with matched hydration (FMH group, n = 87) or to standard intravenous isotonic saline hydration (control group; n = 83). The FMH group received an initial 250-ml intravenous bolus of normal saline over 30 min followed by an intravenous bolus (0.5 mg/kg) of furosemide. Hydration infusion rate was automatically adjusted to precisely replace the patient's urine output. When a urine output rate &gt;300 ml/h was obtained, patients underwent the coronary procedure. Matched fluid replacement was maintained during the procedure and for 4 h post-treatment. The definition of CIN was a &ge;25% or &ge;0.5 mg/dl rise in serum creatinine over baseline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the FMH group, no device- or therapy-related complications were observed. Four (4.6%) patients in the FMH group developed CIN versus 15 (18%) controls (p = 0.005). A lower incidence of cumulative in-hospital clinical complications was also observed in FMH-treated patients than in controls (8% vs. 18%; p = 0.052).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In patients with CKD undergoing coronary procedures, furosemide-induced high urine output with matched hydration significantly reduces the risk of CIN and may be associated with improved in-hospital outcome.</p>
<p>(Induced Diuresis With Matched Hydration Compared to Standard Hydration for Contrast Induced Nephropathy Prevention [MYTHOS]; <A HREF="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00702728?term=NCT00702728&amp;rank=1">NCT00702728</A>)</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marenzi, G., Ferrari, C., Marana, I., Assanelli, E., De Metrio, M., Teruzzi, G., Veglia, F., Fabbiocchi, F., Montorsi, P., Bartorelli, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.017</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/90</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevention of Contrast Nephropathy by Furosemide With Matched Hydration: The MYTHOS (Induced Diuresis With Matched Hydration Compared to Standard Hydration for Contrast Induced Nephropathy Prevention) Trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/98?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contemporary Use and Effectiveness of N-Acetylcysteine in Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/98?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to examine the use of and outcomes associated with use of <I>N</I>-acetylcysteine (NAC) in real-world practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The role of NAC in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is controversial, leading to widely varying recommendations for its use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Use of NAC was assessed in consecutive patients undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention from 2006 to 2009 in the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium, a large multicenter quality improvement collaborative. We examined the overall prevalence of NAC use in these patients and then used propensity matching to link its use with clinical outcomes, including CIN, nephropathy-requiring dialysis, and death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 90,578 percutaneous coronary interventions performed during the study period, NAC was used in 10,574 (11.6%) procedures, with its use steadily increasing over the study period. Patients treated with NAC were slightly older and more likely to have baseline renal insufficiency and other comorbidities. In propensity-matched, risk-adjusted models, we found no differences in outcomes between patients treated with NAC and those not receiving NAC for CIN (5.5% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.99), nephropathy-requiring dialysis (0.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.69), or death (0.6% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.15). These findings were consistent across many prespecified subgroups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Use of NAC is common and has steadily increased over the study period but does not seem to be associated with improved clinical outcomes in real-world practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gurm, H. S., Smith, D. E., Berwanger, O., Share, D., Schreiber, T., Moscucci, M., Nallamothu, B. K., BMC2 (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.019</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/98</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contemporary Use and Effectiveness of N-Acetylcysteine in Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair in High-Surgical-Risk Patients: Do We Hit the Target?]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study sought to assess the feasibility and safety of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve (MV) repair in patients with an unacceptably high operative risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>MV repair for mitral regurgitation (MR) can be accomplished by use of a clip that approximates the free edges of the mitral leaflets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>All patients were declined for surgery because of a high logistic EuroSCORE (&gt;20%) or the presence of other specific surgical risk factors. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after the procedure. Differences in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, quality of life (QoL) using the Minnesota questionnaire, and 6-min walk test (6-MWT) distances were reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Fifty-five procedures were performed in 52 patients (69.2% male, age 73.2 &plusmn; 10.1 years, logistic EuroSCORE 27.1 &plusmn; 17.0%). In 3 patients, partial clip detachment occurred; a second clip was placed successfully. One patient experienced cardiac tamponade. Two patients developed inguinal bleeding, of whom 1 needed surgery. Six patients (11.5%) died during 6-month follow-up (5 patients as a result of progressive heart failure and 1 noncardiac death). The MR grade before repair was &ge;3 in 100%; after 6 months, a reduction in MR grade to &le;2 was present in 79% of the patients. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter, LV ejection fraction, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure improved significantly. Accompanied improvements in NYHA functional class, QoL index, 6-MWT distances, and log N-terminal pro&ndash;B-type natriuretic peptide were observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In a high-risk population, MR reduction can be achieved by percutaneous edge-to-edge valve repair, resulting in LV remodeling with improvement of functional capacity after 6 months.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van den Branden, B. J. L., Swaans, M. J., Post, M. C., Rensing, B. J. W. M., Eefting, F. D., Jaarsma, W., Van der Heyden, J. A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.013</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/105</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair in High-Surgical-Risk Patients: Do We Hit the Target?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/112?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stiff Coronary Stenosis in a Young Female With Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/112?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sasai, H., Sakakura, K., Wada, H., Sugawara, Y., Ako, J., Momomura, S.-i.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.020</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/112</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stiff Coronary Stenosis in a Young Female With Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Images in Intervention</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>112</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>113</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/114?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[First Successful Management of Aortic Valve Insufficiency Associated With HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Support by Transfemoral CoreValve Implantation: The Columbus's Egg?]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/114?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Santini, F., Forni, A., Dandale, R., Ribichini, F., Rossi, A., Franchi, G., Onorati, F., Vassanelli, C., Mazzucco, A., Faggian, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.009</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/114</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[First Successful Management of Aortic Valve Insufficiency Associated With HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Support by Transfemoral CoreValve Implantation: The Columbus's Egg?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Images in Intervention</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>115</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/116?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Very High Perforation Rate in Patients Undergoing Unsuccessful Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of Chronic Total Occlusions Could Explain Worse Outcome in These Patients and Not Chronically Occluded Artery]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/116?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Movahed, M. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.007</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/116</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Very High Perforation Rate in Patients Undergoing Unsuccessful Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of Chronic Total Occlusions Could Explain Worse Outcome in These Patients and Not Chronically Occluded Artery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>116</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/116-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization: A Call for a Randomized Trial]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/116-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Badr, S., Dvir, D., Waksman, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.11.001</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/116-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization: A Call for a Randomized Trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>117</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claessen, B. E., Dangas, G. D., Mehran, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.11.004</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/117</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>118</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use the Ingredients That Are in Season]]></title>
<link>http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/short/5/1/119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[King, S. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-16T13:00:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.12.001</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jaccinterv;5/1/119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American College of Cardiology</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use the Ingredients That Are in Season]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editor&#x27;s Page</prism:section>
<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>120</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
