Table 6

Comparison of Present Study With Other Published Work

Authors (Ref. #)Publication, YearRandomizedTechniqueLesions (N)Angiography Follow-UpTLRRestenosis
N (%)MonthMBSB
Colombo et al. (6)Circulation, 2004YesT-prov229564.54.814.2
Crush63859.55.721.8
Pan et al. (7)Am Heart J, 2004YesT-prov478862.02.05
Mixed44885.01015
Tanabe et al. (28)Am J Cardiol, 2004NoMixed656768.69.113.6
Ge et al. (21)J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005NoCrush18580714.98.911.1
Steigen et al., for Nordic (8)Circulation, 2006YesT-prov207726–81.94.626.4
Crush206766–81.06.414.7
Moussa et al. (19)Am J Cardiol, 2006NoCrush120NA611.3NANA
Hoye et al. (20)J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006NoCrush2417789.76.49.6
Pan et al. (13)Am Heart J, 2007NoT-prov20553815.612.812.8
Galassi et al. (9)Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007NoMC49100812.212.22.0
Galassi et al.Present studyNoT-prov 1-stent17278.4920.317.418.8
T-prov 2-stent8878.5926.118.826
MC19982.1916.011.78.5

MB = main branch; SB = side branch; other abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 4.