Author + information
- Received October 19, 2010
- Accepted October 29, 2010
- Published online March 1, 2011.
- Davide Capodanno, MD⁎,†,⁎ (, )
- Anna Caggegi, MD⁎,
- Marco Miano, MD⁎,
- Glauco Cincotta, MD⁎,
- Fabio Dipasqua, MD⁎,
- Giuseppe Giacchi, MD⁎,
- Piera Capranzano, MD⁎,†,
- Gianpaolo Ussia, MD⁎,
- Maria Elena Di Salvo, MD⁎,
- Alessio La Manna, MD⁎ and
- Corrado Tamburino, MD, PhD⁎,†
- ↵⁎Reprint requests and correspondence:
Dr. Davide Capodanno, Cardiology Department, Ferrarotto Hospital, University of Catania, Via Citelli 6, 95124 Catania, Italy
Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the ability to predict cardiac mortality of the Global Risk Classification (GRC) and the Clinical SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score (CSS) in left main (LM) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
Background There is a renewed interest in combining clinical and angiographic information to define the risk of patients undergoing LM revascularization.
Methods The GRC and CSS were assessed in patients undergoing LM PCI (n = 400) or CABG (n = 549). Stand-alone clinical (ACEF [age, creatinine, ejection fraction]), EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) and angiographic (SYNTAX score) risk scores were also investigated.
Results The GRC (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 0.357, p = 0.550; area under the curve 0.743) and the ACEF (Hosmer-Lemeshow 0.426, p = 0.514; area under the curve 0.741) showed the most balanced predictive characteristics in the PCI and CABG cohorts, respectively. In PCI patients, the CSS used fewer data to achieve similar discrimination but poorer calibration than the GRC. Propensity-adjusted outcomes were comparable between PCI and CABG patients with low, intermediate, or high EuroSCORE, ACEF, GRC, and CSS and those with low or intermediate SYNTAX score. Conversely, in the group with the highest SYNTAX score, the risk of cardiac mortality was significantly higher in PCI patients (hazard ratio: 2.323, 95% confidence interval: 1.091 to 4.945, p = 0.029).
Conclusions In LM patients undergoing PCI, combined scores improve the discrimination accuracy of clinical or angiographic stand-alone tools. In LM patients undergoing CABG, the ACEF score has the best prognostic accuracy compared with other stand-alone or combined scores. The good predictive ability for PCI along with the poor predictive ability for CABG make the SYNTAX score the preferable decision-making tool in LM disease.
- coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
- percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
- risk score
Dr. Ussia is a physical proctor for CoreValve-Medtronic. Dr. Tamburino is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, CeloNova, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships to disclose.
- Received October 19, 2010.
- Accepted October 29, 2010.
- American College of Cardiology Foundation