Author + information
- Received April 17, 2008
- Revision received August 6, 2008
- Accepted August 18, 2008
- Published online December 1, 2008.
- Ruchira Glaser, MD⁎,⁎ (, )
- Srihari S. Naidu, MD†,
- Faith Selzer, PhD‡,
- Alice K. Jacobs, MD§,
- Warren K. Laskey, MD∥,
- Vankeepuram S. Srinivas, MD¶,
- James N. Slater, MD# and
- Robert L. Wilensky, MD⁎⁎
- ↵⁎Reprint requests and correspondence:
Dr. Ruchira Glaser, 252 Chapman Road, Newark, Delaware 19702
Objectives We sought to determine whether poorer outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) during off-hours are related to delays in treatment, circadian changes in biology, or differences in operator-related quality of care.
Background Previous investigation has suggested that patients undergoing primary PCI during off-hours are more likely to have adverse cardiac events than routine-hours patients, but the reasons for this remain poorly defined.
Methods Clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were compared in consecutive patients (n = 685) undergoing primary PCI in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry between 1997 and 2006 that were classified as occurring during routine-hours (07:00 to 18:59) or off-hours (19:00 to 06:59). The primary end points were in-hospital death, MI, and target vessel revascularization.
Results Median time from symptom onset to PCI was similar (off-hours 3.4 h vs. routine-hours 3.3 h). Patients presenting in off-hours were more likely to present with cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease but were equally likely to present with complete occlusion of the infarct-related artery. Procedural complications including dissection were more frequent in off-hours patients. In-hospital death, MI, and target vessel revascularization were significantly higher in off-hours patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.66, p = 0.001), and differences in outcomes were worse even if the procedure was immediately successful (adjusted OR: 2.58, p = 0.005, adjusting for angiographic success). Patients undergoing PCI on weekends had better outcomes during the daytime than nighttime.
Conclusions Patients undergoing primary PCI for acute MI during off-hours are at significantly higher risk for in-hospital death, MI, and target vessel revascularization. These findings appear related to both diurnal differences in presentation and lesion characteristics, as well as differences in procedural complication and success rates that extend beyond differences in symptom-to-balloon time.
Funded in part by a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant (HL33292-14).
Presented in part at the American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions, Orlando, Florida, March 7, 2005.
- Received April 17, 2008.
- Revision received August 6, 2008.
- Accepted August 18, 2008.
- American College of Cardiology Foundation