Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc interventions image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:821-827, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.003
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Related Cardiosource Journal Scan
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Détaint, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vahanian, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Détaint, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vahanian, A.

Determinants of Significant Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Impact of Device and Annulus Discongruence

Delphine Détaint, MD*, Laurent Lepage, MD, Dominique Himbert, MD, Eric Brochet, MD, David Messika-Zeitoun, MD, Bernard Iung, MD, Alec Vahanian, MD

Cardiology Department, Hopital Bichat, Paris, France


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 AR Evaluation in the 16 Patients With AR ≥2/4

Assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) grade in the 16 patients with paravalvular AR ≥2/4, immediately after valve implantation (on the left), after balloon re-dilation (if performed), at the end of the procedure after potential second prosthesis implantation and at 7 days (on the right). Grade of AR are indicated on the left. Solid lines indicate evolution of AR in patients undergoing balloon re-dilation. Double solid lines indicate evolution of AR after implantation of a second prosthesis. Dotted lines represent evolution of AR in patients who did not undergo balloon re-dilation or implantation of a second prosthesis. D4 = day 4 (this patient died 4 days after TAVI); TAVI = transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Assessment of AR in the Study Population

Evaluation of paravalvular AR in 4 grades, immediately after valve implantation (left), at the end of the procedure after potential re-dilation or second prosthesis implantation (middle), and at 7 days (right). Number of patients in each grade is indicated on each bar. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 TTE Aortic Annulus Dimensions in Patients With AR <2/4 and ≥2/4

Scatter plots aortic annulus dimension measured with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) stratified according to paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) classified as mild or less (AR <2/4) and at least of moderate degree (AR ≥2/4). The mean and SD are represented by the bars in each groups. The dotted line indicates the value of aortic annulus (22 mm) under which significant AR is never observed.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 TEE Aortic Annulus Dimensions in Patients With AR <2/4 and ≥2/4

Scatter plots aortic annulus dimension measured with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) stratified according to paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) classified as mild or less (AR <2/4) and at least of moderate degree (AR ≥2/4). The mean and SD are represented by the bars in each groups. The dotted line indicates the value of aortic annulus (22 mm) under which significant AR is never observed.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Distribution of Prosthesis-Annulus Cover Index

Distribution of prosthesis-annulus cover index defined as 100 x ([prosthesis diameter – TEE annulus diameter]/prosthesis diameter). Bar height represents the number of patients. Solid bars indicate patients with AR ≥2/4, and open bars indicate patients with AR <2/4. As shown with the dotted line, AR ≥2/4 was never observed in patients with cover index >8%. Abbreviations as in Figure 4.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link