Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc interventions image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:739-747, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.020
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Related Cardiosource Journal Scan
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naik, H.
Right arrow Articles by Makkar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Naik, H.
Right arrow Articles by Makkar, R.

A Meta-Analysis of 3,773 Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Surgery for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

Hursh Naik, MD*, Anthony J. White, MBBS, PhD*, Tarun Chakravarty, MD*, James Forrester, MD*, Gregory Fontana, MD*, Saibal Kar, MD*, Prediman K. Shah, MD*, Robert E. Weiss, PhD{dagger}, Raj Makkar, MD*,*

* Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
{dagger} Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Search Process Algorithm

Flow chart demonstrating the resulting 10 studies that were analyzed. Subgroups of left main patients were not included due to the possibility of added confounding. ACC = American College of Cardiology; AHA = American Heart Association; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; TCT = Trans-Catheter Therapeutics.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Odds Ratio of Mortality Following Treatment for ULMCA Disease in PCI Versus CABG Patients

Odds ratio of mortality (with confidence intervals) following treatment for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease after 1, 2, and 3 years. Year 1: 1,393 PCI patients and 1,932 CABG patients; year 2: 528 PCI patients and 890 CABG patients; and year 3: 263 PCI patients and 578 CABG patients. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Odds Ratio of MACCE in PCI Versus CABG Patients

Odds ratio of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) in PCI patients versus CABG patients after 1, 2, and 3 years. Year 1: 1,239 PCI patients and 1,614 CABG patients; year 2: 432 PCI patients and 652 CABG patients; and year 3: 236 PCI patients and 451 CABG patients. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Odds Ratio of TVR in PCI Versus CABG Patients

Odds ratio of target vessel revascularization (TVR) in PCI patients versus CABG patients at 1, 2, and 3 years. Year 1: 1,240 PCI patients and 1,692 CABG patients; year 2: 417 PCI patients and 699 CABG patients; and year 3: 211 PCI patients and 447 CABG patients. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link