Complicated Acute Type B Dissection: Is Surgery Still the Best Option?A Report From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection
Rossella Fattori, MD*,*,
Thomas T. Tsai, MD ,
Truls Myrmel, MD, PhD||,
Arturo Evangelista, MD, FESC¶,
Jeanna V. Cooper, MS ,
Santi Trimarchi, MD ,
Jin Li, MS ,
Luigi Lovato, MD*,
Stephan Kische, MD ,
Kim A. Eagle, MD ,
Eric M. Isselbacher, MD#,
Christoph A. Nienaber, MD, FACC, FESC
* University Hospital S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Istituto Policlinico San Donato, Milano, Italy
University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
|| University Hospital of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
¶ Hospital General Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
# Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 1 Propensity-Matched Quartiles
In quartiles 1 and 4, the patients are less well matched and are treated predominantly with endovascular therapy in quartile 1 and surgery in quartile 2. Quartiles 2 and 3 are well matched and balanced with regard to therapy (16 surgery and 29 endovascular therapy).
|
|
|