top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 


bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2008; 1:317-326, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.03.013
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Little, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Little, W. C.

Trends in Vascular Complications After Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Via the Femoral Artery, 1998 to 2007

Robert J. Applegate, MD, FACC*, Matthew T. Sacrinty, MPH, Michael A. Kutcher, MD, FACC, Frederic R. Kahl, MD, FACC, Sanjay K. Gandhi, MD, FACC, Renato M. Santos, MD, FACC, William C. Little, MD, FACC

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Any Vascular Complications by Procedure and Closure Method

Graph depicting the incidence of any vascular complication by procedure type and closure method from 1998 to 2007. CATH = diagnostic cardiac catheterization; MC = manual compression; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; VCD = vascular closure device.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Any Vascular Complications by Vascular Closure Device

Graph of the incidence of any vascular complication by procedure type and vascular closure device from 1998 to 2007. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Any Vascular Complications by Sheath Size

Graph of the incidence of any vascular complication for each sheath size for PCI and CATH from 1998 to 2007. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Risk-Adjusted Incidence of Vascular Complications

Graph of the incidence of any vascular complication by procedure type and closure method from 1998 to 2007 adjusted for patient and procedural confounders. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 ORs of Vascular Complications by Categorical Comparison of Sheath Sizes

Univariate analysis of the odds ratio of any vascular complication stratified by procedure and sheath size for the entire study period. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 




 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link