The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Measured Acutely Predicts the Extent and Severity of Myocardial Infarction in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Ross McGeoch, MB, ChB*, ,*,
Stuart Watkins, MB, ChB, MD*,
Colin Berry, MB, ChB, MD*, ,
Tracey Steedman, BSc*,
Andrew Davie, MB, ChB, MD*,
John Byrne, MB, ChB, MD*,
Stewart Hillis, MB, ChB, PhD*,
Mitchell Lindsay, MB, ChB, MD*,
Stephen Robb, MB, ChB, MD*,
Henry Dargie, MB, ChB, MD*,
Keith Oldroyd, MB, ChB, MD*
* Department of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Ross J. McGeoch, Department of Cardiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, United Kingdom (Email: rossmcgeoch{at}doctors.net.uk).
Objectives: This study investigated the relationship between the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) with myocardial injury and microvascular obstruction (MVO) assessed by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (ceCMR) imaging in a broad range of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background: Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for assessment of microvascular obstruction (MVO), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, and infarct volumes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, ceCMR is not available acutely. The index of microcirculatory resistance is a simple invasive measure of microvascular function available at the time of emergency PCI. We investigated the relationship between IMR with myocardial injury and MVO assessed by ceCMR in STEMI patients undergoing emergency PCI.
Methods: Fifty-seven patients with STEMI were included and 53 (93%) and 47 (82%) patients had complete ceCMR scans 2 days and 3 months following MI, respectively. Microvascular obstruction was defined as a dark core of hypoenhancement within the area of hyperenhanced infarct tissue 10 to 15 min following intravenous gadolinium (0.1 mmol/kg).
Results: The median IMR (interquartile range [IQR]) was 35 (24 to 63) U. Twenty-seven patients (46%) had MVO. We found that IMR (median [IQR]) was higher in patients with MVO (38 [29 to 55] U) than in patients without MVO (27 [18 to 36] U); p = 0.003). The index of microcirculatory resistance was a negative multivariable predictor of LV ejection fraction, (p 0.001) and infarct volume (p = 0.01) on the ceCMR scan 2 days after MI, and IMR was a multivariable predictor of LV ejection fraction (p = 0.028) and infarct volume (p = 0.048) at 3 months.
Conclusions: The index of microcirculatory resistance measured acutely was higher in patients with MVO on ceCMR, and IMR independently predicted LV function and infarct volume. This easily measured physiological parameter provides important prognostic information at the time of emergency PCI.
Key Words: myocardial infarction index of microcirculatory resistance magnetic resonance imaging
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ceCMR = contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging | | IMR = index of microcirculatory resistance | | LV = left ventricular | | MVO = microvascular obstruction | | PCI = percutaneous intervention | | STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction | | TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction |
|
|