Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc interventions image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2010; 3:78-86, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.020
© 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pelliccia, F.
Right arrow Articles by Pasceri, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pelliccia, F.
Right arrow Articles by Pasceri, V.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Clinical Research

Role of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Restenosis and Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

A Prospective Study

Francesco Pelliccia, MD, PhD*,{ddagger}, Cinzia Cianfrocca, MD*,{ddagger}, Giuseppe Rosano, MD, PhD{dagger}, Giuseppe Mercuro, MD{ddagger}, Giulio Speciale, MD*, Vincenzo Pasceri, MD, PhD*,*

* Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
{dagger} Department of Medical Sciences, Istituto di Ricovero Cura a Carrettere Scientifico San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
{ddagger} Department of Cardiovascular and Neurologic Diseases, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Vincenzo Pasceri, Cardiovascular Department, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Via G. Martinotti 20, 00135 Rome, Italy (Email: vpasceri{at}hotmail.com).

Objectives: We prospectively investigated the relationship of circulating endothelial progenitor cells at time of percutaneous coronary intervention to the subsequent development of in-stent restenosis or progression of coronary atherosclerosis.

Background: Endothelial progenitor cells provide an endogenous repair mechanism of the dysfunctional endothelium and therefore can play a pathogenic role in coronary atherosclerosis.

Methods: We studied 155 consecutive stable angina patients (92 men, age 60 ± 11 years). All patients had flow cytometry the day before elective percutaneous coronary intervention in order to derive subpopulations of endothelial progenitor cells. A control group of 20 normal subjects was considered for comparison.

Results: At 8-month control angiography, 30 patients showed in-stent restenosis (restenosis group), 22 patients showed progression of coronary atherosclerosis (progression group), whereas the remaining 103 patients had neither in-stent restenosis nor progression of coronary atherosclerosis (stable group). Comparison of the 3 groups did not show any difference in risk factors, cardiac morphology and function, extension of coronary artery disease, and treatment. Absolute numbers of CD34+/KDR+/CD45– cells (i.e., progenitors of endothelial lineage) measured in the restenosis group (1.41 ± 0.64 cells/µl) were significantly higher than in the progression, stable, and control groups (1.03 ± 0.53 cells/µl, 1.07 ± 0.46 cells/µl, and 0.95 ± 0.44 cells/µl, respectively, p < 0.05). Similarly, CD133+/KDR+/CD45– cells (i.e., progenitors of endothelial cells at an earlier stage) were significantly higher in the restenosis (0.63 ± 0.23 cells/µl) compared with progression, stable, and control groups (0.33 ± 0.19 cells/µl, 0.41 ± 0.32 cells/µl, and 0.36 ± 0.15 cells/µl, respectively, p < 0.001). Also, numbers of CD14+/CD45+ cells (i.e., which have a role in angiogenesis via a paracrine effect) were significantly different among the restenosis, progression, stable, and control groups (0.72 ± 0.56 cells/µl vs. 0.51 ± 0.52 cells/µl vs. 0.28 ± 0.54 cells/µl vs. 0.62 ± 0.67 cells/µl, respectively, p < 0.05), whereas CD105+/CD45–/CD34– cells (i.e., which have a receptor for transforming growth factor-beta) were similar among groups.

Conclusions: Patients with restenosis have higher numbers of subpopulations of endothelial progenitor cells that incorporate into endothelial cells or play a role in arteriogenesis compared with controls and patients with either progression of coronary atherosclerosis or stable disease.

Key Words: angiogenesis • endothelial progenitor cells • percutaneous coronary intervention • restenosis • stem cells

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  EPC = endothelial progenitor cell
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention


Related Article

Understanding the Role of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Cardiovascular Disease, Coronary Artery Lesion Progression, and In-Stent Restenosis
Robbert J. De Winter and Margo Klomp
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2010 3: 87-89. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
R. J. De Winter and M. Klomp
Understanding the Role of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Cardiovascular Disease, Coronary Artery Lesion Progression, and In-Stent Restenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., January 1, 2010; 3(1): 87 - 89.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link