Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc interventions image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:498-503, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.013
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Cardiosource Journal Scan
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chacko, R.
Right arrow Articles by Cutlip, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chacko, R.
Right arrow Articles by Cutlip, D. E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Clinical Research

Impact of Target Lesion and Nontarget Lesion Cardiac Events on 5-Year Clinical Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stenting

Riya Chacko, MD*, Meredith Mulhearn, MD*, Victor Novack, MD, PhD{dagger}, Lena Novack, PhD{dagger}, Laura Mauri, MD, MSc{dagger},{ddagger}, Sidney A. Cohen, MD, PhD§,||, Jeffrey Moses, MD, Martin B. Leon, MD, Donald E. Cutlip, MD*,{dagger},*

* Department of Medicine and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger} Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
§ Cordis Inc., Warren, New Jersey
|| Cardiology Division, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Division of Cardiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia University, New York, New York

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Donald E. Cutlip, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 (Email: dcutlip{at}bidmc.harvard.edu).

Objectives: We sought to compare patient-oriented outcomes related to target vessel or nontarget vessel events for sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus bare-metal stents.

Background: SES significantly reduce restenosis but the influence of reduced restenosis on overall patient-oriented outcome has not been reported.

Methods: The study population included 1,057 patients randomized in the SIRIUS (Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Lesions) study and followed clinically for 5 years. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization. In secondary analyses, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization events attributed to the target vessel or a nontarget vessel were compared by stent type.

Results: Patients with an SES were more likely to be free from the primary composite end point at 5 years (60.4% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001) chiefly due to a sustained reduction in target lesion revascularization for SES (cumulative incidence: 12.5% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of myocardial infarction or revascularization attributed to remote segments of the target vessel. Events attributed to the nontarget vessel were frequent and not different for SES versus bare-metal stents (25.7% vs. 25.8%).

Conclusions: The benefit of SES over bare-metal stents for reduced target lesion revascularization is maintained for 5 years. Remote coronary segments of the target vessel and nontarget vessel remain an important cause of future adverse events despite sustained restenosis benefit.

Key Words: stent • restenosis • atherosclerosis

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BMS = bare-metal stent(s)
  DES = drug-eluting stent(s)
  MI = myocardial infarction
  SES = sirolimus-eluting stent(s)
  TLR = target lesion revascularization


Related Article

Drug-Eluting Stents: Safe But Not Sufficient
Robert A. Vogel
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2009 2: 513-514. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. R. Holmes Jr, D. J. Kereiakes, S. Garg, P. W. Serruys, G. J. Dehmer, S. G. Ellis, D. O. Williams, T. Kimura, and D. J. Moliterno
Stent Thrombosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2010; 56(17): 1357 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
E. S. Brilakis, J. M. Lasala, D. A. Cox, P. B. Berger, T. S. Bowman, R. M. Starzyk, and K. D. Dawkins
Outcomes After Implantation of the TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: Results From the ARRIVE (TAXUS Peri-Approval Registry: A Multicenter Safety Surveillance) Program
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., July 1, 2010; 3(7): 742 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. L. Dauerman
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Diabetes Mellitus, and Death
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 16, 2010; 55(11): 1076 - 1079.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
M. B. Leon, D. J. Allocco, K. D. Dawkins, and D. S. Baim
Late Clinical Events After Drug-Eluting Stents: The Interplay Between Stent-Related and Natural History-Driven Events
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 504 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
R. A. Vogel
Drug-Eluting Stents: Safe But Not Sufficient
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 513 - 514.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link