Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc interventions image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:136-143, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.09.012
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Weintraub, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klein, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Weintraub, W. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Clinical Research

A Longitudinal Assessment of Coronary Interventional Program Quality

A Report From the American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry

Lloyd W. Klein, MD, FACC*,*, Paul Kolm, PhD{dagger}, Xin Xu, MS{dagger}, Ronald J. Krone, MD, FACC{ddagger}, H. Vernon Anderson, MD, FACC§, John S. Rumsfeld, MD, PhD, FACC||, Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH, FACC, William S. Weintraub, MD, FACC{dagger}

* Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois
{dagger} Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
{ddagger} Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
§ University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
|| American College of Cardiology, Bethesda, Maryland
Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Lloyd W. Klein, Director, Clinical Cardiology Associates, Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, 675 West North Avenue, Melrose Park, Illinois 60160 (Email: lloydklein{at}comcast.net).

Objectives: This study applied risk adjustment methods to evaluate member institutions of the American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry with respect to in-hospital mortality in percutaneous coronary intervention patients over a 4-year period to assess variability in risk-adjusted performance measures.

Background: Cardiac catheterization laboratories, hospital networks, and third-party payers are interested in assessing the outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions. Evaluation of outcomes without considering case selection may lead to erroneous conclusions about program quality.

Methods: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry database was queried for all percutaneous coronary intervention cases performed between January 1, 2001, and September 30, 2004. Random effects logistic regression was used to develop models of in-hospital mortality and compute an expected mortality rate for each program. The observed mortality rate in each program was divided by the program's predicted rate to obtain the observed/expected (O/E) mortality ratio. Change in the O/E ratio was assessed by a generalized estimating equation approach to repeated measures. An index of variability was calculated by the mean absolute difference between O/E ratios of each pair of years.

Results: There were 664,909 interventional procedures performed in 403 National Cardiovascular Data Registry programs from 2001 to 2004. There was no significant systematic change in O/E ratios over the 4-year period, but there was significantly greater variation in O/E ratios associated with lower percutaneous coronary intervention volume programs.

Conclusions: Our risk-adjustment models had very good discrimination and were relatively consistent over the study period. There was substantial within-program variation in O/E ratios. This information would provide an indication for a detailed examination of individual programs.

Key Words: percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes • risk-adjusted models • program quality

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACC-NCDR = American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry
  O/E = observed to expected mortality ratio
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  RAMR = risk-adjusted mortality rate


Related Article

The Role of Risk Models in Upholding Standards for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
James G. Jollis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2009 2: 144-145. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
J. G. Jollis
The Role of Risk Models in Upholding Standards for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2009; 2(2): 144 - 145.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link