Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc interventions image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:1208-1218, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.008
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Mini-Focus Issue: Second-Generation DES

Late Safety, Efficacy, and Cost-Effectiveness of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Compared With a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions

2-Year Follow-Up From the ENDEAVOR IV Trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions)

Martin B. Leon, MD*,*, David E. Kandzari, MD{dagger}, Eric L. Eisenstein, DBA{ddagger}, Kevin J. Anstrom, PhD{ddagger}, Laura Mauri, MD, MSc§, Donald E. Cutlip, MD||, Eugenia Nikolsky, MD*, Charles O'Shaughnessy, MD, Paul A. Overlie, MD#, Ajay J. Kirtane, MD*, Brent T. McLaurin, MD**, Stuart L. Solomon, MD{dagger}{dagger}, John S. Douglas, Jr, MD{ddagger}{ddagger}, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD|| for the ENDEAVOR IV Investigators

* Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
{dagger} Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
{ddagger} Duke Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
§ Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
|| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Elyria Memorial Hospital, Elyria, Ohio
# Lubbock Heart Hospital, Lubbock, Texas
** Anderson Medical Center, Anderson, South Carolina
{dagger}{dagger} Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
{ddagger}{ddagger} Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Martin B. Leon, Professor of Medicine and Associate Director, Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032 (Email: mleon{at}crf.org).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess, after 2 years of follow-up, the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients with native coronary lesions.

Background: Early drug-eluting stents were associated with a small but significant incidence of very late stent thrombosis (VLST), occurring >1 year after the index procedure. The ZES has shown encouraging results in clinical trials.

Methods: The ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions), a randomized (1:1), single-blind, controlled trial (n = 1,548) compared ZES versus PES in patients with single de novo coronary lesions. Two-year follow-up was obtained in 96.0% of ZES and 95.4% of PES patients. The primary end point was target vessel failure (TVF), and safety end points included Academic Research Consortium-defined stent thrombosis. Economic end points analyzed included quality-adjusted survival, medical costs, and relative cost-effectiveness of ZES and PES.

Results: The TVF at 2 years was similar in ZES and PES patients (11.1% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.232). There were fewer myocardial infarctions (MIs) in ZES patients (p = 0.022), due to fewer periprocedural non–Q-wave MIs and fewer late MIs between 1 and 2 years. Late MIs were associated with increased VLST (PES: 6 vs. ZES: 1; p = 0.069). Target lesion revascularization was similar comparing ZES with PES (5.9% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.295), especially in patients without planned angiographic follow-up (5.2% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.896). The cost-effectiveness of ZES and PES was similar.

Conclusions: After 2 years of follow-up, ZES demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness comparable to PES, with fewer MIs and a trend toward less VLST. (The ENDEAVOR IV Clinical Trial: A Trial of a Coronary Stent System in Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00217269)

Key Words: angioplasty • coronary disease • drug-eluting stent • revascularization • stent thrombosis

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ARC = Academic Research Consortium
  BMS = bare-metal stent(s)
  DES = drug-eluting stent(s)
  DRG = diagnosis-related group
  MACE = major adverse cardiac events
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PES = paclitaxel-eluting stent(s)
  QALY = quality-adjusted life year
  ST = stent thrombosis
  TLR = target lesion revascularization
  TVF = target vessel failure
  VLST = very late stent thrombosis
  ZES = zotarolimus-eluting stent(s)


Related Article

Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents and the Continuous Need for Rapidly Available Real-World Data
Debabrata Mukherjee and David J. Moliterno
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2009 2: 1236-1239. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
D. E. Kandzari, C. S. Barker, M. B. Leon, L. Mauri, W. Wijns, J. Fajadet, and R. Mehran
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration and Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment With Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2011; 4(10): 1119 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
L. Mauri, J. M. Massaro, S. Jiang, I. Meredith, W. Wijns, J. Fajadet, D. E. Kandzari, M. B. Leon, D. E. Cutlip, and K. P. Thompson
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes With Zotarolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Coronary Stents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., December 1, 2010; 3(12): 1240 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
E. L. Eisenstein, M. B. Leon, D. E. Kandzari, L. Mauri, R. Edwards, D. F. Kong, P. A. Cowper, K. J. Anstrom, and for the ENDEAVOR III Investigators
Long-Term Clinical and Economic Analysis of the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stent: 3-Year Results From the ENDEAVOR III Trial (Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., December 1, 2009; 2(12): 1199 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
D. Mukherjee and D. J. Moliterno
Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents and the Continuous Need for Rapidly Available Real-World Data
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., December 1, 2009; 2(12): 1236 - 1239.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link