Mini-Focus Issue: Second-Generation DES |
3-Year Clinical Follow-Up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Coronary Artery LesionsThe SPIRIT II Trial (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions)
Scot Garg, MBChB*,
Patrick Serruys, MD, PhD*,*,
Yoshinobu Onuma, MD*,
Cécile Dorange, MSc ,
Susan Veldhof, RN ,
Karine Miquel-Hébert, PhD ,
Krishnankutty Sudhir, MD, PhD ,
Jean Boland, MD ,
Kurt Huber, MD||,
Eulogio Garcia, MD¶,
Jan A.M. te Riele, MD# on behalf of the SPIRIT II Investigators
* Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Abbott Vascular, Diegem, Belgium
Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California
C.H.R. La Citadelle, Liege, Belgium
|| Wilhelminenspital der Stadt, Vienna, Austria
¶ University Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
# Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Prof. Patrick Serruys, Ba583a, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC,'s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Email: p.w.j.c.serruys{at}erasmusmc.nl).
Objectives: This paper reports the 3-year clinical outcomes of the XIENCE V (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with the TAXUS (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in the randomized SPIRIT II (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) study.
Background: The Xience V EES is a new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) that might offer advantages over the first-generation DES in terms of improved clinical outcomes and a better safety profile.
Methods: The SPIRIT II trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind, clinical trial, randomizing 300 patients with de novo coronary artery lesions in a ratio of 3:1 to either EES or PES. The primary end point was in-stent late loss at 180 days.
Results: At 3-year clinical follow-up cardiac death was numerically lower with EES than PES (0.5% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.056). The observed rate of myocardial infarction was 3.6% for EES and 7.2% for PES (p = 0.31). The rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization was 4.6% and 10.1% for EES and PES, respectively (p = 0.14). Overall, there was a trend for lower major adverse cardiovascular events in the EES group compared with PES (7.2% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.053). The rate of stent thrombosis was low and comparable in both groups (EES 1.0% vs. PES 2.9%).
Conclusions: The present study reports the favorable 3-year clinical outcomes of the EES, which are consistent with the results from other studies of the EES with shorter follow-up.
Key Words: angioplasty everolimus-eluting stent paclitaxel-eluting stent
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ARC = Academic Research Consortium | | BMS = bare-metal stent(s) | | CABG = coronary artery bypass graft | | CI = confidence interval | | CK-MB = creatinine kinase-myocardial band | | DES = drug-eluting stent(s) | | DS = diameter stenosis | | EES = everolimus-eluting stent(s) | | HR = hazard ratio | | ID-TLR = ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization | | IVUS = intravascular ultrasound | | MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events | | MI = myocardial infarction | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | PES = paclitaxel-eluting stent(s) | | RR = relative risk | | SES = sirolimus-eluting stent(s) | | ULN = upper limit of normal | | TVF = target vessel failure | | TVR = target vessel revascularization |
|
Related Article
-
Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents and the Continuous Need for Rapidly Available Real-World Data
- Debabrata Mukherjee and David J. Moliterno
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2009 2: 1236-1239.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Krucoff, D. R. Rutledge, L. Gruberg, L. Jonnavithula, J. N. Katopodis, W. Lombardi, V. W. Mao, S. K. Sharma, C. A. Simonton, H. P. Tamboli, et al.
A New Era of Prospective Real-World Safety Evaluation: Primary Report of XIENCE V USA (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System Condition-of-Approval Post-Market Study)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
December 1, 2011;
4(12):
1298 - 1309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Baber, R. Mehran, S. K. Sharma, S. Brar, J. Yu, J.-W. Suh, H.-S. Kim, S.-J. Park, A. Kastrati, A. de Waha, et al.
Impact of the Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Stent Thrombosis: A Meta-Analysis of 13 Randomized Trials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 4, 2011;
58(15):
1569 - 1577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Alfonso and C. Fernandez
Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: Moving the Field Forward
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 28, 2011;
58(1):
26 - 29.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Garg and P. W. Serruys
Coronary Stents: Current Status
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 31, 2010;
56(10_Suppl_S):
S1 - S42.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Garg and P. W. Serruys
Coronary Stents: Looking Forward
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 31, 2010;
56(10_Suppl_S):
S43 - S78.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Garg and P. W Serruys
Drug-eluting stents: a reappraisal
Heart,
April 1, 2010;
96(7):
489 - 493.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Windecker and L. Raber
The DESIRE-Late Registry: What Is Left to Be Desired?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
January 1, 2010;
3(1):
19 - 21.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mukherjee and D. J. Moliterno
Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents and the Continuous Need for Rapidly Available Real-World Data
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
December 1, 2009;
2(12):
1236 - 1239.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|