Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc interventions image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:1190-1198, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.002
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Garg, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Mini-Focus Issue: Second-Generation DES

3-Year Clinical Follow-Up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

The SPIRIT II Trial (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions)

Scot Garg, MBChB*, Patrick Serruys, MD, PhD*,*, Yoshinobu Onuma, MD*, Cécile Dorange, MSc{dagger}, Susan Veldhof, RN{dagger}, Karine Miquel-Hébert, PhD{dagger}, Krishnankutty Sudhir, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Jean Boland, MD§, Kurt Huber, MD||, Eulogio Garcia, MD, Jan A.M. te Riele, MD# on behalf of the SPIRIT II Investigators

* Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
{dagger} Abbott Vascular, Diegem, Belgium
{ddagger} Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California
§ C.H.R. La Citadelle, Liege, Belgium
|| Wilhelminenspital der Stadt, Vienna, Austria
University Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
# Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Prof. Patrick Serruys, Ba583a, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC,'s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Email: p.w.j.c.serruys{at}erasmusmc.nl).

Objectives: This paper reports the 3-year clinical outcomes of the XIENCE V (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with the TAXUS (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in the randomized SPIRIT II (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) study.

Background: The Xience V EES is a new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) that might offer advantages over the first-generation DES in terms of improved clinical outcomes and a better safety profile.

Methods: The SPIRIT II trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind, clinical trial, randomizing 300 patients with de novo coronary artery lesions in a ratio of 3:1 to either EES or PES. The primary end point was in-stent late loss at 180 days.

Results: At 3-year clinical follow-up cardiac death was numerically lower with EES than PES (0.5% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.056). The observed rate of myocardial infarction was 3.6% for EES and 7.2% for PES (p = 0.31). The rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization was 4.6% and 10.1% for EES and PES, respectively (p = 0.14). Overall, there was a trend for lower major adverse cardiovascular events in the EES group compared with PES (7.2% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.053). The rate of stent thrombosis was low and comparable in both groups (EES 1.0% vs. PES 2.9%).

Conclusions: The present study reports the favorable 3-year clinical outcomes of the EES, which are consistent with the results from other studies of the EES with shorter follow-up.

Key Words: angioplasty • everolimus-eluting stent • paclitaxel-eluting stent

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ARC = Academic Research Consortium
  BMS = bare-metal stent(s)
  CABG = coronary artery bypass graft
  CI = confidence interval
  CK-MB = creatinine kinase-myocardial band
  DES = drug-eluting stent(s)
  DS = diameter stenosis
  EES = everolimus-eluting stent(s)
  HR = hazard ratio
  ID-TLR = ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization
  IVUS = intravascular ultrasound
  MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  PES = paclitaxel-eluting stent(s)
  RR = relative risk
  SES = sirolimus-eluting stent(s)
  ULN = upper limit of normal
  TVF = target vessel failure
  TVR = target vessel revascularization


Related Article

Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents and the Continuous Need for Rapidly Available Real-World Data
Debabrata Mukherjee and David J. Moliterno
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2009 2: 1236-1239. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
M. W. Krucoff, D. R. Rutledge, L. Gruberg, L. Jonnavithula, J. N. Katopodis, W. Lombardi, V. W. Mao, S. K. Sharma, C. A. Simonton, H. P. Tamboli, et al.
A New Era of Prospective Real-World Safety Evaluation: Primary Report of XIENCE V USA (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System Condition-of-Approval Post-Market Study)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., December 1, 2011; 4(12): 1298 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
U. Baber, R. Mehran, S. K. Sharma, S. Brar, J. Yu, J.-W. Suh, H.-S. Kim, S.-J. Park, A. Kastrati, A. de Waha, et al.
Impact of the Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Stent Thrombosis: A Meta-Analysis of 13 Randomized Trials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 4, 2011; 58(15): 1569 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Alfonso and C. Fernandez
Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: Moving the Field Forward
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 28, 2011; 58(1): 26 - 29.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Garg and P. W. Serruys
Coronary Stents: Current Status
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 31, 2010; 56(10_Suppl_S): S1 - S42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Garg and P. W. Serruys
Coronary Stents: Looking Forward
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 31, 2010; 56(10_Suppl_S): S43 - S78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S. Garg and P. W Serruys
Drug-eluting stents: a reappraisal
Heart, April 1, 2010; 96(7): 489 - 493.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
S. Windecker and L. Raber
The DESIRE-Late Registry: What Is Left to Be Desired?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., January 1, 2010; 3(1): 19 - 21.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
D. Mukherjee and D. J. Moliterno
Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents and the Continuous Need for Rapidly Available Real-World Data
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., December 1, 2009; 2(12): 1236 - 1239.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link