top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 


bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:1083-1091, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.016
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montalescot, G.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Montalescot, G.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Clinical Research

Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

1-Year Results From the STEEPLE (SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in Percutaneous coronary intervention patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation) Trial

Gilles Montalescot, MD, PhD*,*, Richard Gallo, MD{dagger}, Harvey D. White, MB, ChB, DSc{ddagger}, Marc Cohen, MD§, Ph. Gabriel Steg, MD||, Philip E.G. Aylward, MB, ChB, PhD, Christoph Bode, MD, PhD#, Massimo Chiariello, MD**, Spencer B. King, III, MD{dagger}{dagger}, Robert A. Harrington, MD{ddagger}{ddagger}, Walter J. Desmet, MD§§, Carlos Macaya, MD, PhD||||, Steven R. Steinhubl, MD¶¶,## for the STEEPLE Investigators

* Institut du Cœur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
{dagger} The Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
{ddagger} Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
§ Division of Cardiology, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey
|| INSERM U-698, Université Paris 7 and AP-HP, Paris, France
Cardiology Research, Flinders Medical Centre, South Australia, Australia
# Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
** Division of Cardiology, Federico 2nd University, Naples, Italy
{dagger}{dagger} St Joseph's Heart and Vascular Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
{ddagger}{ddagger} Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
§§ University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
|||| Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain
¶¶ Geisinger Clinic, Geisinger Center for Health Research, Danville, Pennsylvania
## The Medicines Company, Zurich, Switzerland

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Gilles Montalescot, Institut du Cœur, Bureau 2-236, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France (Email: gilles.montalescot{at}psl.aphp.fr).

Objectives: Our purpose was to evaluate long-term mortality and identify factors associated with 1-year mortality in patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background: While long-term outcomes in PCI patients have been reported previously, limited data are currently available regarding the comparative long-term outcomes in PCI patients who receive enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH).

Methods: We conducted a follow-up analysis of clinical outcomes at 1 year in patients enrolled in the STEEPLE (SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in Percutaneous coronary intervention patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation) trial of 3,528 patients undergoing elective PCI. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous 0.50-mg/kg or 0.75-mg/kg enoxaparin or intravenous UFH during elective PCI procedures. All-cause mortality at 1 year after index PCI was the main outcome measure.

Results: Mortality rates were 1.4%, 2.0%, and 1.5% from 1 month to 1 year, and 2.3%, 2.2%, and 1.9% from randomization to 1 year, after index PCI in patients receiving 0.50 mg/kg enoxaparin, 0.75 mg/kg enoxaparin, and UFH, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified nonfatal myocardial infarction and/or urgent target vessel revascularization up to 30 days after index PCI (hazard ratio: 3.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.7 to 7.3; p < 0.001), and major bleeding within 48 h (hazard ratio: 3.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 8.5; p = 0.04) as the strongest independent risk factors for 1-year mortality.

Conclusions: The 1-year mortality rates were low and comparable between patients receiving enoxaparin and UFH during elective PCI. Periprocedural ischemic or bleeding events were the strongest independent predictors of 1-year mortality. (The STEEPLE Trial; NCT00077844)

Key Words: percutaneous coronary intervention • enoxaparin • STEEPLE • unfractionated heparin

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACS = acute coronary syndromes
  ACT = activated clotting time
  CI = confidence interval
  CK = creatine kinase
  CK-MB = creatine kinase-myocardial/brain mass
  HR = hazard ratio
  LMWH = low-molecular-weight heparin
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  UFH = unfractionated heparin
  ULNR = upper limit of the normal range
  UTVR = urgent target vessel revascularization


Related Article

Antithrombin Therapy for Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Which Agent to Use? Does It Matter?
Sorin J. Brener
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2009 2: 1092-1094. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
S. J. Brener
Antithrombin Therapy for Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Which Agent to Use? Does It Matter?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., November 1, 2009; 2(11): 1092 - 1094.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link