Mini-Focus Issue: Transradial Approach |
Mechanism and Predictors of Failed Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Payam Dehghani, MD*,
Atif Mohammad, MD*,
Ravi Bajaj, BSc*,
Tony Hong, BSc*,
Colin M. Suen, BSc*,
Waseem Sharieff, MD ,
Robert J. Chisholm, MD*,
Michael J.B. Kutryk, MD, PhD ,
Neil P. Fam, MD, MSc*,
Asim N. Cheema, MD, PhD*,*
* Terrence Donnelly Heart Center, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Asim N. Cheema, Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada (Email: cheemaa{at}smh.toronto.on.ca).
Objectives: The study aimed to determine the mechanism and predictors of procedural failure in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the transradial approach (TR).
Background: Transradial approach PCI reduces vascular complications compared with a transfemoral approach (TF). However, the mechanism and predictors of TR-PCI failure have not been well-characterized.
Methods: The study population consisted of patients undergoing TR-PCI by low-to-intermediate volume operators with traditional TF guide catheters. Baseline characteristics, procedure details, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of TR-PCI failure.
Results: A total of 2,100 patients underwent TR-PCI and represented 38% of PCI volume. Mean age was 64 ± 12 years, and 17% were female. Vascular complications occurred in 22 (1%), and TR-PCI failure was observed in 98 (4.7%) patients. The mechanism of TR-PCI failure included inability to advance guide catheter to ascending aorta in 50 (51%), inadequate guide catheter support in 35 (36%), and unsuccessful radial artery puncture in 13 (13%) patients. The PCI was successful in 94 (96%) patients with TR-PCI failure by switching to TF. On multivariate analysis, age >75 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.33 to 6.40, p = 0.0006), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR: 7.47; 95% CI: 3.45 to 16.19, p = 0.0002), and height (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.99, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of TR-PCI failure.
Conclusions: Transradial approach PCI can be performed by low-to-intermediate volume operators with standard equipment with a low failure rate. Age >75 years, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and short stature are independent predictors of TR-PCI failure. Appropriate patient selection and careful risk assessment are needed to maximize benefits offered by TR-PCI.
Key Words: coronary intervention radial artery vascular access
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BMI = body mass index | | CABG = coronary artery bypass graft surgery | | CI = confidence interval | | LCA = left coronary artery | | OR = odds ratio | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | RCA = right coronary artery | | TF = transfemoral approach | | TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction | | TR = transradial approach |
|
Related Article
-
Transradial Access: Just Do It!
- Tift Mann
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2009 2: 1065-1066.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-J. Yang, D. E. Kandzari, Z. Gao, B. Xu, J.-L. Chen, S.-B. Qiao, J.-J. Li, X.-W. Qin, M. Yao, Y.-J. Wu, et al.
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Method of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of Procedural and Late-Term Outcomes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
October 1, 2010;
3(10):
1035 - 1042.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Mann
Transradial Access: Just Do It!
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
November 1, 2009;
2(11):
1065 - 1066.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|