Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc interventions image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:967-976, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.008
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirtane, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kirtane, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M. B.

Clinical Research

Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in Diabetics From the ENDEAVOR IV Trial

Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Ajay J. Kirtane, MD, SM*, Rikesh Patel, MD*, Charles O'Shaughnessy, MD{dagger}, Paul Overlie, MD{ddagger}, Brent McLaurin, MD§, Stuart Solomon, MD||, Laura Mauri, MD, MSc, Peter Fitzgerald, MD, PhD#, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD**, David E. Kandzari, MD{dagger}{dagger}, Martin B. Leon, MD*,*

* Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
{dagger} Elyria Memorial Hospital, Elyria, Ohio
{ddagger} Lubbock Heart Hospital, Lubbock, Texas
§ Anderson Medical Center, Anderson, South Carolina
|| Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
# Stanford University, Stanford, California
** Caritas Cardiovascular Center, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger}{dagger} Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Martin B. Leon, Professor of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Associate Director, Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032 (Email: mleon{at}crf.org).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine outcomes related to the use of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, California) compared with the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) in the 477 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) enrolled in the randomized ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) trial.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients is associated with increased rates of restenosis-related end points compared with PCI in nondiabetic patients. Although ZES has been associated with similar clinical efficacy compared with PES in the overall trial population of the ENDEAVOR IV trial, whether these results are maintained in the higher-risk restenosis subgroup of patients with DM has not been determined.

Methods: Clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared according to randomized treatment assignment to either ZES or PES.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among ZES (n = 241) and PES (n = 236) diabetic patients, with slightly longer lesion lengths in PES-treated patients (12.9 mm vs. 14.0 mm, p = 0.041). Among the 86 DM patients assigned to routine angiographic follow-up (18% of the overall DM cohort), in-stent percent diameter stenosis at 8 months was greater among ZES-treated patients (32.9 vs. 21.1, p = 0.023), with a trend toward higher in-stent late loss. One-year clinical outcomes were similar among DM patients treated with either ZES or PES (target vessel failure: 8.6% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.53; target lesion revascularization: 6.9% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.70; target vessel revascularization: 8.6% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.87). There were no significant interactions between DM status and stent type with respect to the outcomes measured, and the relative efficacy/safety of ZES and PES were similar among insulin- and noninsulin-requiring subgroups.

Conclusions: One-year clinical outcomes were similar among DM patients treated with ZES and PES in the ENDEAVOR IV trial. These findings parallel the overall trial results, which demonstrated similar efficacy and safety of ZES and PES for single de novo coronary lesions.

Key Words: diabetes mellitus • drug-eluting stent • Endeavor IV • zotarolimus

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ARC = Academic Research Consortium
  BMS = bare-metal stent
  DM = diabetes mellitus
  IDDM = insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
  MACE = major adverse cardiac events
  MLD = minimum lumen diameter
  NIDDM = noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  PES = paclitaxel-eluting stent
  QCA = quantitative coronary angiography
  TLR = target lesion revascularization
  TVR = target vessel revascularization
  TVF = target vessel failure
  ZES = zotarolimus-eluting stent




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
K.-H. Mak
The Continuing Diabetic Drug-Eluting Stents Saga: From Very-Late Stent Thrombosis to Very-Late Late Loss
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., March 1, 2011; 4(3): 324 - 326.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Garg and P. W. Serruys
Coronary Stents: Current Status
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 31, 2010; 56(10_Suppl_S): S1 - S42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 18, 2010; 55(20): 2272 - 2286.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link