top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 


bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:1-8, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.10.010
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forrester, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Makkar, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Forrester, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Makkar, R. R.

State-of-the-Art Paper

New Paradigms of Myocardial Regeneration Post-Infarction

Tissue Preservation, Cell Environment, and Pluripotent Cell Sources

James S. Forrester, MD, FACC*, Anthony J. White, MD, Satoshi Matsushita, MD, Tarun Chakravarty, MD, Raj R. Makkar, MD, FACC

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles, California

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. James S. Forrester, Burns and Allen Professor, Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90048 (Email: forrester{at}cshs.org).

Meta-analyses of intracoronary autologous bone marrow cell infusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction establish the procedure as safe. Nonetheless, the typical small increase in ejection fraction is of uncertain clinical significance, with little if any evidence of myocardial regeneration. In this paper, we describe 3 new paradigms of myocardial preservation and regeneration that provide reasonable hope that the goal of myocardial rejuvenation can be achieved. The first paradigm is that substantial preservation of myocardium is possible even during the period of coronary occlusion and immediate reperfusion, before interventions aimed at myocardial regeneration. The factors that induce myocardial preservation may also create an environment more receptive to subsequent myocardial regeneration. The second paradigm is that the local environment may regulate the behavior of cells in the ischemic/infarct region. For instance, adult cells may be induced to re-enter the cell cycle and proliferate with appropriate environmental modification. The final paradigm is that autologous cardiac stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells can create new myocytes and myocardium. Taken together, these new ideas, each still to be proven, suggest that the goal of regenerating functioning new myocardium can still be achieved.

Key Words: stem cell • cardiosphere-derived cell • bone marrow cell • myocardial regeneration • myocardial preservation

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BMC = bone-marrow mononuclear cell
  CDC = cardiosphere-derived cell
  CSC = cardiac stem cell
  MI = myocardial infarction
  RISK = reperfusion injury serine kinase
  TGF = transforming growth factor




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. S. Forrester, R. R. Makkar, and E. Marban
Long-term outcome of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction: right results, wrong reasons.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 16, 2009; 53(24): 2270 - 2272.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link