Mini-Focus: Platelet Responsiveness |
Clopidogrel 150 mg/day to Overcome Low Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary InterventionResults From the VASP-02 (Vasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein-02) Randomized Study
Boris Aleil, MD, PhD*, ,
Laurent Jacquemin, MD ,
Fabien De Poli, MD ,
Michel Zaehringer, MD ,
Jean-Philippe Collet, MD PhD||,
Gilles Montalescot, MD, PhD||,
Jean-Pierre Cazenave, MD, PhD*,
Marie-Claude Dickele, MD ,
Jean-Pierre Monassier, MD, FESC ,
Christian Gachet, MD, PhD*,*
* Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U.311, Etablissement Français du Sang-Alsace, Strasbourg, France
Service de Cardiologie, Clinique de l'Orangerie, Strasbourg, France
Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse
Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Général, Haguenau, France
|| Institut de Cardiologie and INSERM U856, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Christian Gachet, EFS-Alsace, 10, rue Spielmann, B.P. No. 36, F-67065 Strasbourg. Cedex, France (Email: christian.gachet{at}efs-alsace.fr).
Objectives: We investigated whether maintenance therapy with clopidogrel 150 mg/day produces greater platelet inhibition than the standard 75-mg/day dose and whether the higher maintenance dose increases platelet inhibition in low responders to clopidogrel 75 mg/day.
Background: Patients show interindividual variability in their platelet response to clopidogrel. Low responders could potentially obtain greater clinical benefit from greater doses of clopidogrel.
Methods: One hundred fifty-three elective percutaneous coronary intervention patients were randomized to clopidogrel 150 mg/day (n = 58) or 75 mg/day (n = 95) for 4 weeks, with vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein assay-guided switching to clopidogrel 150 mg/day after 2 weeks in low responders (platelet reactivity index 69%). All patients received aspirin 75 mg/day.
Results: After 2 weeks, clopidogrel 150 mg/day produced a significantly lower platelet reactivity index than clopidogrel 75 mg/day (43.9 ± 17.3% vs. 58.6 ± 17.7%; p < 0.0001). The proportion of low responders was significantly lower in patients randomized to clopidogrel 150 mg/day than in those randomized to clopidogrel 75 mg/day (8.6% vs. 33.7%; p = 0.0004). In the clopidogrel 75 mg/day group, 64.5% (20 of 31) of low responders became responders after switching to clopidogrel 150 mg/day for 2 weeks. No major bleeds occurred during the study; the incidence of minor bleeds was similar in each treatment group.
Conclusions: In elective percutaneous coronary intervention patients, a 150-mg/day clopidogrel maintenance dose produces greater inhibition of platelet function than clopidogrel 75 mg/day. In low responders to clopidogrel 75 mg/day, switching to clopidogrel 150 mg/day overcomes low responsiveness in a majority of patients. These findings warrant further clinical evaluation. (VASP-02; EudraCT number: 2004-005230-40).
Key Words: clopidogrel coronary stenting platelet function
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ADP = adenosine diphosphate | | CI = confidence interval | | MFI = mean fluorescence intensity | | OR = odds ratio | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | PGE1
= prostaglandin E1 | | PPI = proton-pump inhibitor | | PRI = platelet reactivity index | | VASP = vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Wallentin
P2Y12 inhibitors: differences in properties and mechanisms of action and potential consequences for clinical use
Eur. Heart J.,
August 2, 2009;
30(16):
1964 - 1977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Verstuyft, T. Simon, and R. B. Kim
Personalized medicine and antiplatelet therapy: ready for prime time?
Eur. Heart J.,
August 2, 2009;
30(16):
1943 - 1963.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
How Should Clopidogrel Nonresponders Be Treated?
Journal Watch Cardiology,
January 21, 2009;
2009(121):
2 - 2.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. King III and K. M. Momary
Thienopyridines: Time for Personalized Therapy?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
December 1, 2008;
1(6):
718 - 719.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|