top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 


bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Imaging Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2008; 1:511-520, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.08.007
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kruk, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hochman, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kruk, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hochman, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Clinical Research

Predictors of Outcome and the Lack of Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Across the Risk Strata in Patients With Persistent Total Occlusion After Myocardial Infarction

Results From the OAT (Occluded Artery Trial) Study

Mariusz Kruk, MD, PhD*, Jacek Kadziela, MD, PhD*, Harmony R. Reynolds, MD, FACC{dagger}, Sandra A. Forman, MA{ddagger}, Zygmunt Sadowski, MD, FACC, FESC*, Bruce A. Barton, PhD{ddagger}, Daniel B. Mark, MD, FACC§, Aldo P. Maggioni, MD, FESC||, Jonathan Leor, MD, FACC, John G. Webb, MD, FACC#, Michael Kapeliovich, MD, EC**, Jose A. Marin-Neto, MD, PhD, FACC{dagger}{dagger}, Harvey D. White, MD, FACC{ddagger}{ddagger}, Gervasio A. Lamas, MD, FACC§§, Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC{dagger},*

* Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
{dagger} New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
{ddagger} Maryland Medical Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
§ Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
|| Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologist (ANMCO) Research Center, Florence, Italy
Neufeld Cardiac Research Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel
# St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
** Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
{dagger}{dagger} Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto-USP, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
{ddagger}{ddagger} Green Lane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland, New Zealand
§§ University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Judith S. Hochman, New York University School of Medicine; 530 First Avenue, Skirball 9R, New York, New York 10016 (Email: Judith.Hochman{at}nyumc.org).

Objectives: This study sought to determine predictors of outcome and examine the influence of baseline risk on therapeutic impact of late mechanical opening of a persistently occluded infarct related artery after myocardial infarction in stable patients.

Background: Previous studies in patients with acute coronary syndromes suggest that the impact of infarct-related artery recanalization on clinical outcome is greatest in patients at highest risk.

Methods: Of 2,201 patients (age 58.6 ± 11.0 years) with infarct-related artery occlusion on days 3 to 28 after myocardial infarction in the OAT (Occluded Artery Trial) study, 1,101 were assigned to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 1,100 to medical therapy alone and followed for a mean of 3.2 years. The primary end point was a composite of death, reinfarction, or New York Heart Association functional class IV heart failure. Interaction of treatment effect with tertiles of predicted survival were examined using the Cox survival model.

Results: The 5-year rate for the primary end point was 18.9% versus 16.1% for patients assigned to PCI and medical treatment alone, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92 to 1.43, p = 0.23). Lack of benefit of PCI was consistent across the risk spectrum for both the primary end point and total mortality, including for the highest tertile (33.9% PCI vs. 27.3% medical treatment alone, HR: 1.27, 99% CI: 0.87 to 1.85 primary end point and 23.5% PCI vs. 21.7% medical treatment alone, HR: 1.16, 99% CI: 0.73 to 1.85 mortality). The independent predictors of the composite outcome were history of heart failure (HR: 2.06, p < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (HR: 1.93, p = 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.49, p = 0.002), rales (HR: 1.88, p < 0.001), decreasing ejection fraction (HR: 1.48 per 10%, p < 0.001), decreasing days from myocardial infarction to randomization (HR: 1.04 per day, p < 0.001), and decreasing glomerular filtration rate (HR: 1.11 per 10 ml/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In the OAT study, there was no variation in the effect of PCI on clinical outcomes at different levels of patient risk, including the subset with very high event rates. (Occluded Artery Trial [OAT]; NCT00004562)

Key Words: myocardial infarction • revascularization • risk factors • trials

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACS = acute coronary syndrome
  EF = ejection fraction
  IRA = infarct-related artery
  LV = left ventricular
  LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction
  MI = myocardial infarction
  NYHA = New York Heart Association
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention


Related Article

Is an Occluded Artery Better Than an Open One?
David Antoniucci
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2008 1: 521-523. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2080 - 2097.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
D. Antoniucci
Is an Occluded Artery Better Than an Open One?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2008; 1(5): 521 - 523.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link