Outcomes and Complications With Off-Label Use of Drug-Eluting StentsResults From the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Group
Bruce R. Brodie, MD*,*,
Thomas Stuckey, MD*,
William Downey, MD*,
Angela Humphrey, MS ,
Barbara Bradshaw, RN*,
Chris Metzger, MD ,
James Hermiller, MD ,
Fred Krainin, MD||,
Stanley Juk, MD¶,
Barry Cheek, MD#,
Peter Duffy, MD**,
Henry Smith, MD ,
John Edmunds, MD ,
Jay Varanasi, MD ,
Charles A. Simonton, MD STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Group
* LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Greensboro, North Carolina
R. Stuart Dickson Institute for Health Studies, Charlotte, North Carolina
Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, Tennessee
Indiana Heart Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
|| McLeod Regional Medical Center, Florence, South Carolina
¶ Sisters of Charity Providence Hospitals, Columbia, South Carolina
# High Point Regional Health System, High Point, North Carolina
** Moore Regional Medical Center, Pinehurst, North Carolina
 Eagle Cardiology, Greensboro, North Carolina
 Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Bruce R. Brodie, 1126 North Church Street, Suite 300, Greensboro, North Carolina 27401. (Email: bbrodie{at}triad.rr.com).
Objectives: This study evaluates outcomes and complications in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) for "off-label" indications.
Background: Drug-eluting stents have been effective in randomized trials, but their safety and efficacy for off-label indications has not been well studied.
Methods: The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Registry is the largest multicenter U.S. registry evaluating outcomes of DES. Off-label indications included ostial, left main, long, bifurcation, and in-stent restenotic lesions, saphenous vein grafts, chronic total occlusions, small or large vessels, multilesion or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Outcomes were adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity analyses.
Results: Drug-eluting stents were used in an off-label manner in 59% of patients. The patients who received off-label treatment were more often male, had a higher incidence of prior infarction and bypass surgery, and lower ejection fractions. Off-label versus "on-label" use of DES was associated with higher rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis at 9 months and 2 years. Off-label use of DES compared with off-label use of bare-metal stents (BMS) had lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events at 9 months and 2 years and lower rates of stent thrombosis at 9 months.
Conclusions: Off-label use of DES is associated with higher event rates compared with on-label use of DES, which is consistent with a higher risk clinical and lesion profile. However, event rates with off-label use of DES are lower compared with off-label use of BMS. Pending results from randomized trials, our data support the use of DES for off-label indications in selected patients.
Key Words: drug-eluting stents off-label indications percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BMS = bare-metal stent(s) | | DES = drug-eluting stent(s) | | MACE = major adverse cardiac events | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction | | TLR = target lesion revascularization | | TVR = target vessel revascularization |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. G. Stefanini, P. W. Serruys, S. Silber, A. A. Khattab, R. J. van Geuns, G. Richardt, P. E. Buszman, H. Kelbaek, A. J. van Boven, S. H. Hofma, et al.
The Impact of Patient and Lesion Complexity on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes After Revascularization With Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Substudy of the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 31, 2011;
57(22):
2221 - 2232.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Farooq, B. D. Gogas, and P. W. Serruys
Restenosis: Delineating the Numerous Causes of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis
Circ Cardiovasc Interv,
April 1, 2011;
4(2):
195 - 205.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Holmes Jr, D. J. Kereiakes, S. Garg, P. W. Serruys, G. J. Dehmer, S. G. Ellis, D. O. Williams, T. Kimura, and D. J. Moliterno
Stent Thrombosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 19, 2010;
56(17):
1357 - 1365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Garg and P. W. Serruys
Coronary Stents: Current Status
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 31, 2010;
56(10_Suppl_S):
S1 - S42.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. R. Brodie, H. Wilson, T. Stuckey, M. Nussbaum, S. Laurent, B. Bradshaw, A. Humphrey, C. Metzger, J. Hermiller, F. Krainin, et al.
Outcomes With Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: Results From the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Group
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
November 1, 2009;
2(11):
1105 - 1112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 2, 2009;
53(22):
2080 - 2097.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Weustink, A. F.L. Schinkel, M. van der Ent, and P. J. de Feyter
Pre-Procedural Dual Source 64-Slice Computed Tomography in Unprotected Left Main Intervention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
May 1, 2009;
2(5):
470 - 471.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Brilakis, C. Lichtenwalter, J. A. de Lemos, M. Roesle, O. Obel, D. Haagen, B. Saeed, C. Gadiparthi, J. K. Bissett, R. Sachdeva, et al.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Similar Bare-Metal Stent in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: The SOS (Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 17, 2009;
53(11):
919 - 928.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|