Outcomes and Complications With Off-Label Use of Drug-Eluting StentsResults From the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Group
Bruce R. Brodie, MD*,*,
Thomas Stuckey, MD*,
William Downey, MD*,
Angela Humphrey, MS ,
Barbara Bradshaw, RN*,
Chris Metzger, MD ,
James Hermiller, MD ,
Fred Krainin, MD||,
Stanley Juk, MD¶,
Barry Cheek, MD#,
Peter Duffy, MD**,
Henry Smith, MD ,
John Edmunds, MD ,
Jay Varanasi, MD ,
Charles A. Simonton, MD STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Group
* LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Greensboro, North Carolina
R. Stuart Dickson Institute for Health Studies, Charlotte, North Carolina
Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, Tennessee
Indiana Heart Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
|| McLeod Regional Medical Center, Florence, South Carolina
¶ Sisters of Charity Providence Hospitals, Columbia, South Carolina
# High Point Regional Health System, High Point, North Carolina
** Moore Regional Medical Center, Pinehurst, North Carolina
 Eagle Cardiology, Greensboro, North Carolina
 Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Bruce R. Brodie, 1126 North Church Street, Suite 300, Greensboro, North Carolina 27401. (Email: bbrodie{at}triad.rr.com).
Objectives: This study evaluates outcomes and complications in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) for "off-label" indications.
Background: Drug-eluting stents have been effective in randomized trials, but their safety and efficacy for off-label indications has not been well studied.
Methods: The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Registry is the largest multicenter U.S. registry evaluating outcomes of DES. Off-label indications included ostial, left main, long, bifurcation, and in-stent restenotic lesions, saphenous vein grafts, chronic total occlusions, small or large vessels, multilesion or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Outcomes were adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity analyses.
Results: Drug-eluting stents were used in an off-label manner in 59% of patients. The patients who received off-label treatment were more often male, had a higher incidence of prior infarction and bypass surgery, and lower ejection fractions. Off-label versus "on-label" use of DES was associated with higher rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis at 9 months and 2 years. Off-label use of DES compared with off-label use of bare-metal stents (BMS) had lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events at 9 months and 2 years and lower rates of stent thrombosis at 9 months.
Conclusions: Off-label use of DES is associated with higher event rates compared with on-label use of DES, which is consistent with a higher risk clinical and lesion profile. However, event rates with off-label use of DES are lower compared with off-label use of BMS. Pending results from randomized trials, our data support the use of DES for off-label indications in selected patients.
Key Words: drug-eluting stents off-label indications percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BMS = bare-metal stent(s) | | DES = drug-eluting stent(s) | | MACE = major adverse cardiac events | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction | | TLR = target lesion revascularization | | TVR = target vessel revascularization |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. R. Brodie, H. Wilson, T. Stuckey, M. Nussbaum, S. Laurent, B. Bradshaw, A. Humphrey, C. Metzger, J. Hermiller, F. Krainin, et al.
Outcomes With Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: Results From the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Group
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
November 1, 2009;
2(11):
1105 - 1112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 2, 2009;
53(22):
2080 - 2097.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Weustink, A. F.L. Schinkel, M. van der Ent, and P. J. de Feyter
Pre-Procedural Dual Source 64-Slice Computed Tomography in Unprotected Left Main Intervention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
May 1, 2009;
2(5):
470 - 471.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Brilakis, C. Lichtenwalter, J. A. de Lemos, M. Roesle, O. Obel, D. Haagen, B. Saeed, C. Gadiparthi, J. K. Bissett, R. Sachdeva, et al.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Similar Bare-Metal Stent in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: The SOS (Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 17, 2009;
53(11):
919 - 928.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|