This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Mahmud, E. Articles by Tsimikas, S. PubMed Articles by Mahmud, E. Articles by Tsimikas, S. Related Collections Related Article

Renal Frame Count and Renal Blush Grade

Quantitative Measures That Predict the Success of Renal Stenting in Hypertensive Patients With Renal Artery Stenosis

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Ehtisham Mahmud, Cardiovascular Catheterization Laboratories, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, California 92103-8784. (Email: emahmud{at}ucsd.edu).

Objectives: This study sought to identify angiographic parameters of favorable clinical response to renal artery stenting.

Background: Stenting improves blood pressure (BP) control in patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS), but markers predicting a favorable clinical response are limited.

Methods: Renal perfusion was quantified in hypertensive patients (BP 140/90 mm Hg) without RAS by determining renal frame count (RFC) (angiographic frames [30 frames/s] for contrast to reach distal renal parenchyma after initial renal artery opacification) and renal blush grade (RBG) (0: none, 1: minimal, 2: normal, 3: hyperemic parenchymal blush). It was hypothesized that stenting unilateral RAS in hypertensive patients would result in decreased RFC and increased RBG, which might predict BP reduction.

Results: The RFC in 17 consecutive hypertensive patients without RAS (control group) (64.4 ± 14.2 years, 12 male, 22 kidneys) was 20.1 ± 5.4, whereas RBG was 2.33 ± 0.66. In 24 consecutive hypertensive patients with unilateral RAS (study group) (72.7 ± 11.3 years, 8 male), reduced RFC (26.6 ± 9.1 to 21.4 ± 6.7, p < 0.001) and increased RBG (1.63 ± 0.71 to 2.13 ± 0.85, p = 0.03) were observed after renal stenting. At 6 months, reduced BP (systolic BP 150.6 ± 15.6 mm Hg to 128.6 ± 15.5 mm Hg, p < 0.001; diastolic BP 77.2 ± 15.6 mm Hg to 68.3 ± 10.4 mm Hg, p = 0.022) without change in number of hypertensive medications was observed. Clinical responders (systolic BP reduction >15 mm Hg) had a greater decrease in RFC (7.7 ± 4.6 vs. 1.7 ± 5.1, p = 0.009) and 78.6% of patients with >4 RFC decrease were responders (p = 0.024).

Conclusions: This study shows that quantitative indices of renal perfusion (RFC and RBG) are impaired in patients with RAS and improve after stenting, and that RFC reduction is associated with BP reduction.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   BP = blood pressure   RA = renal artery/arteries   RAS = renal artery stenosis   RBG = renal blush grade   RFC = renal frame count

Related Article

Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: Where's Waldo?

Patrick L. Whitlow
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2008 1: 293-294. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. L. Whitlow Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: Where's Waldo? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 293 - 294. [Full Text] [PDF]