A Novel Filter-Based Distal Embolic Protection Device for Percutaneous Intervention of Saphenous Vein Graft LesionsResults of the AMEthyst Randomized Controlled Trial
Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, FACC*,*,
Mark A. Turco, MD, FACC ,
Jeffrey Breall, MD, PhD ,
Naim Z. Farhat, MD ,
Robert L. Feldman, MD¶,
Brent McLaurin, MD||,
Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC**,
Laura Mauri, MD, MSc**, ,
Peter Zimetbaum, MD , ,
Joseph Massaro, PhD ,
Donald E. Cutlip, MD , on behalf of the AMEthyst Study Investigators
* The Christ Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and the Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
Center for Cardiac & Vascular Research, Washington Adventist Hospital, Takoma Park, Maryland
Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
North Ohio Heart Center, Elyria, Ohio
¶ Munroe Regional Medical Center, Ocala, Florida
|| Anderson Area Medical Center, Anderson, South Carolina
** Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
 Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Dean J. Kereiakes, The Lindner Center, 2123 Auburn Avenue, Suite 424, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219. (Email: lindner{at}fuse.net).
Objectives: We sought to evaluate the relative safety and efficacy of the novel Interceptor PLUS Coronary Filter System (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, California) compared with approved embolic-protection devices (e.g., GuardWire, Medtronic Vascular/FilterWire EZ, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of degenerative saphenous vein grafts (SVG).
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention of degenerative SVG is associated with embolization of atherothrombotic debris and subsequent myocardial infarction in a significant portion of patients. The use of distal embolic-protection devices has previously been demonstrated to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events associated with PCI in these patients.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized noninferiority trial, 797 patients undergoing PCI with stenting of SVG stenoses (de novo or restenotic) with reference vessel diameter 2.5 mm to 5.25 mm were randomly assigned 2:1 to either the Interceptor PLUS (n = 533) or control distal-protection devices (GuardWire [n = 191], FilterWire EZ [n = 73]) at the physician's discretion.
Results: The trial primary clinical end point (composite occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent repeat revascularization through 30 days) was observed in 8% and 7.3% of Interceptor and control-treated patients, respectively (p = 0.025 for noninferiority; p = 0.77 for difference). Key secondary end points for device and procedural success were similar between randomly assigned treatment strategies.
Conclusions: The Interceptor PLUS Coronary Filter System is noninferior in safety and efficacy to 30 days when compared with the GuardWire and FilterWire EZ distal embolic protection devices.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BMS = bare-metal stent(s) | | CABG = coronary bypass graft surgery | | CK = creatine kinase | | DES = drug-eluting stent(s) | | FDA = Food and Drug Administration | | GP = glycoprotein | | ITT = intention to treat | | MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events | | MI = myocardial infarction | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | PP = per protocol | | SVG = saphenous vein graft | | TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction | | TVR = target vessel revascularization |
|
Related Article
-
Aspirating and Filtering Atherothrombotic Debris During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Eric R. Bates
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2008 1: 265-267.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. R. Bates
Aspirating and Filtering Atherothrombotic Debris During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
June 1, 2008;
1(3):
265 - 267.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|