top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 


bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2008; 1:248-257, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.03.009
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kereiakes, D. J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kereiakes, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Clinical Research

A Novel Filter-Based Distal Embolic Protection Device for Percutaneous Intervention of Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions

Results of the AMEthyst Randomized Controlled Trial

Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, FACC*,*, Mark A. Turco, MD, FACC{dagger}, Jeffrey Breall, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Naim Z. Farhat, MD§, Robert L. Feldman, MD, Brent McLaurin, MD||, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC**, Laura Mauri, MD, MSc**,{dagger}{dagger}, Peter Zimetbaum, MD{dagger}{dagger},{ddagger}{ddagger}, Joseph Massaro, PhD{dagger}{dagger}, Donald E. Cutlip, MD{dagger}{dagger},{ddagger}{ddagger} on behalf of the AMEthyst Study Investigators

* The Christ Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and the Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
{dagger} Center for Cardiac & Vascular Research, Washington Adventist Hospital, Takoma Park, Maryland
{ddagger} Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
§ North Ohio Heart Center, Elyria, Ohio
Munroe Regional Medical Center, Ocala, Florida
|| Anderson Area Medical Center, Anderson, South Carolina
** Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger}{dagger} Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger}{ddagger} Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Dean J. Kereiakes, The Lindner Center, 2123 Auburn Avenue, Suite 424, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219. (Email: lindner{at}fuse.net).

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the relative safety and efficacy of the novel Interceptor PLUS Coronary Filter System (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, California) compared with approved embolic-protection devices (e.g., GuardWire, Medtronic Vascular/FilterWire EZ, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of degenerative saphenous vein grafts (SVG).

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention of degenerative SVG is associated with embolization of atherothrombotic debris and subsequent myocardial infarction in a significant portion of patients. The use of distal embolic-protection devices has previously been demonstrated to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events associated with PCI in these patients.

Methods: In this multicenter, randomized noninferiority trial, 797 patients undergoing PCI with stenting of SVG stenoses (de novo or restenotic) with reference vessel diameter 2.5 mm to 5.25 mm were randomly assigned 2:1 to either the Interceptor PLUS (n = 533) or control distal-protection devices (GuardWire [n = 191], FilterWire EZ [n = 73]) at the physician's discretion.

Results: The trial primary clinical end point (composite occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent repeat revascularization through 30 days) was observed in 8% and 7.3% of Interceptor and control-treated patients, respectively (p = 0.025 for noninferiority; p = 0.77 for difference). Key secondary end points for device and procedural success were similar between randomly assigned treatment strategies.

Conclusions: The Interceptor PLUS Coronary Filter System is noninferior in safety and efficacy to 30 days when compared with the GuardWire and FilterWire EZ distal embolic protection devices.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BMS = bare-metal stent(s)
  CABG = coronary bypass graft surgery
  CK = creatine kinase
  DES = drug-eluting stent(s)
  FDA = Food and Drug Administration
  GP = glycoprotein
  ITT = intention to treat
  MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  PP = per protocol
  SVG = saphenous vein graft
  TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
  TVR = target vessel revascularization


Related Article

Aspirating and Filtering Atherothrombotic Debris During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Eric R. Bates
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2008 1: 265-267. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
E. R. Bates
Aspirating and Filtering Atherothrombotic Debris During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 265 - 267.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link