top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 


bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2008; 1:34-43, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2007.10.001
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dove, J. T.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, D. R., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Dove, J. T.

Viewpoint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Stable Angina

A Reassessment

David R. Holmes, Jr, MD, FACC*,*, Bernard J. Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhil, FACC*,1, Patrick Whitlow, MD, FACC{dagger},2, Spencer B. King, III, MD, MACC{ddagger},3, James T. Dove, MD, FACC§

* Department of Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Disease and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
{dagger} The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
{ddagger} Fuqua Heart Center, Atlanta, Georgia
§ Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. David R. Holmes, Jr., Department of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. (Email: holmes.david{at}mayo.edu).

As it approaches its fourth decade, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now the most widely used revascularization strategy around the world and has been tested in multiple clinical scenarios against both medical and surgical therapies. For each patient group and clinical scenario setting, the goals of therapy must be specifically defined and clearly understood as an integral component of the process of selecting the optimal strategy for the individual patient. In patients with chronic stable, often mild angina, the major achievable goals of PCI are to affect symptoms, either by decreasing them or preventing them, reduce the need for subsequent procedures, and relieve ischemia. Achievement of these goals has been documented in multiple randomized trials of PCI versus medical therapy. In these trials of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), however, no reduction in death and myocardial infarction has been observed, and these limitations of PCI in this clinical setting need to be emphasized. Given the typically diffuse nature of CAD and the fact that PCI only treats a segment within a coronary artery, this is not surprising. Although optimal medical therapy forms the cornerstone of management for any patient with CAD, among stable patients who do fail medical therapy, percutaneous coronary revascularization plays a well-documented significant role in improving symptoms and preventing the subsequent need for revascularization. The appropriate utilization rates of PCI in patients with chronic stable angina and preserved left ventricular function should lead to more cost-effective care of patients with stable CAD.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme
  ACS = acute coronary syndromes
  BMS = bare-metal stent(s)
  CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  DES = drug-eluting stent(s)
  FDA = Food and Drug Administration
  LV = left ventricular
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  PTCA = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
  STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction






 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link