top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 


bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2008; 1:22-31, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2007.10.005
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JACC Interventions
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romagnoli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Romagnoli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, A.

Viewpoint

Drug-Eluting Stenting

The Case for Post-Dilation

Enrico Romagnoli, MD, PhD*, Giuseppe M. Sangiorgi, MD*, John Cosgrave, MD*, Edouard Guillet{dagger}, Antonio Colombo, MD*,*

* Emo Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy
{dagger} Medtronic Corporation, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Antonio Colombo, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Via Buonarroti 48, Milan, Italy 20145. (Email: colombo{at}emocolumbus.it).

In clinical practice, adequate stent deployment has an important effect on immediate and long-term results after percutaneous coronary interventions. In particular, suboptimal or incomplete stent expansion is associated with increased restenosis and target vessel revascularization rates and, especially with drug-eluting stents (DES), might also predispose to stent thrombosis. Notwithstanding the significant improvement in technique and materials in the last decade, adjunctive high-pressure balloon dilation is still necessary to improve the minimum stent area and the uniform volumetric stent expansion in a majority of the cases. Indeed, in the published reports, the incidence of incomplete stent deployment ranges from 20% to 30% of cases, but it is significantly higher in trials in which stent expansion was assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Although there are not enough randomized studies about this topic, data from published reports continue to support the use of proper post-dilation in the majority of patients undergoing both bare-metal stent and DES implantation. This review will summarize the different anatomical, clinical, and device-related variables for increased risk of suboptimal stent delivery, highlighting the importance of adequate high-pressure post-dilation to obtain optimal stent expansion to positively affect stent thrombosis and restenosis.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BMS = bare-metal stent(s)
  CSA = cross-sectional area
  DES = drug-eluting stent(s)
  IVUS = intravascular ultrasound
  MSA = minimal stent area
  MSD = minimal stent diameter
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  RCT = randomized clinical trial
  SES = sirolimus-eluting stent(s)
  TVR = target vessel revascularization


Related articles in JACC Interventions:

Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Technique Matters, More Than Ever
Bernard De Bruyne and Emanuele Barbato
JACC Interventions 2008 1: 32-33. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
B. De Bruyne and E. Barbato
Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Technique Matters, More Than Ever
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2008; 1(1): 32 - 33.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link